Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
Post Reply
Megabeatman
Redshirt
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 7:57 am
Contact:

Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by Megabeatman »

http://sfdebris.com/videos/startrek/v834.php

With the release of this review, Chuck has completed the first 2 seasons of Voyager. He did bring up an interesting point that Torres was arguing with essentially a past version of herself and the mistake she made. I think that’s why he bumped the score higher than what he had originally.
AlucardNoir
Officer
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:15 pm

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by AlucardNoir »

He also made a Jedi joke... and following the latest episode of STD I really think it was in poor taste... fucking Myceleal network with it's fucking spores and it's fucking dark side and it's fucking force ghosts. AH well, at least STD makes us appreciate ENT and VOY episodes more. Episodes like this one were the certainty and arrogance of youth and fundamentalism is faced with the experience and growth that comes with living long enough to see the folly of your ways. Also: fuck Discovery.
If Chuck or a mod reads this feel free do delete my account. I would do it myself but I don't seem to be able to find a delete account option. phpBB should have such an option but I guess this isn't stock phpBB.
bronnt
Officer
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:30 pm

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by bronnt »

Yeah, the Cardassians never seemed like the people who were building super-advanced unstoppable warships. And the idea that the thing was just supposed to blow itself up?

The thing is, there's an interesting character story being told with Torres here. It's one of my favorite Torres-centric episodes. It's just that it seems like they couldn't figure out how to set this up. I wouldn't be surprised if the ship was supposed to be something the Maquis built, only someone pointed out how insane it would be if the Maquis could build an unstoppable supership, and they fixed it by having it be a Cardassian ship the Maquis somehow lucked their way into.
User avatar
AllanO
Officer
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by AllanO »

I think this episode speaks to the psychological power of the suicide weapon. Killing trained airplane pilots in kamikaze runs is a waste of resources, but it has a psychological appeal for the attacker and a psychological horror for the victim because of just how acute the damage that can be inflicted by such a strike, if successful. This neglects that multiple less dramatic strikes is almost certainly a better use of resources. As a robot drone this thing could apparently have done far more damage doing lots of conventional attacks (Voyager could not stop it and it ran for over a year on its own) rather than one big explosion. So the psychological power of such a weapon is in this story somehow translated into physical power?

Perhaps they could have made a better story if they had had Torres run across such a thing while on a supply run in a runabout and Voyager was unable to intercept the dreadnought before it reached its target. Then the dreadnought would have only had to have been slightly tougher (or faster) than a runabout rather than the uber war machine seen here, which maybe makes more tactical sense if it could deliver moon cracking power in its final move. This would have been obviously contrived but perhaps less of a plot hole.
Yours Truly,
Allan Olley

"It is with philosophy as with religion : men marvel at the absurdity of other people's tenets, while exactly parallel absurdities remain in their own." John Stuart Mill
bronnt
Officer
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:30 pm

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by bronnt »

AllanO wrote:Perhaps they could have made a better story if they had had Torres run across such a thing while on a supply run in a runabout and Voyager was unable to intercept the dreadnought before it reached its target. Then the dreadnought would have only had to have been slightly tougher (or faster) than a runabout rather than the uber war machine seen here, which maybe makes more tactical sense if it could deliver moon cracking power in its final move. This would have been obviously contrived but perhaps less of a plot hole.
I like this a bit better. You can have Chakotay and maybe one other person in the shuttlecraft with her, and they're going to be struggling to figure out what they can accomplish with just a shuttle. It's contrived that they'd be out of range of Voyager to prevent it moving at high warp, sure, but makes sense that this warhead has more limited defensive capabilities, just being survivable enough to reach its target and then blow up. Then you can have the scene where they're planning to dismantle it for parts and it makes a bit more sense.
Darth Wedgius
Captain
Posts: 2948
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:43 pm

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by Darth Wedgius »

Roxanne Dawson did a nice job in this one. Having LeVar Burton direct it probably didn't hurt any, either.
I need to re-watch it and find out if they ever explained why they couldn't just beam a photon torpedo into it or beam away vital parts, like the circuitry of the antimatter containment system.
Edit: I finally re-watched it, and they never did explain that.
Last edited by Darth Wedgius on Sun Feb 04, 2018 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mickey_Rat15
Officer
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:26 pm

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by Mickey_Rat15 »

AllanO wrote:I think this episode speaks to the psychological power of the suicide weapon. Killing trained airplane pilots in kamikaze runs is a waste of resources, but it has a psychological appeal for the attacker and a psychological horror for the victim because of just how acute the damage that can be inflicted by such a strike, if successful. This neglects that multiple less dramatic strikes is almost certainly a better use of resources. As a robot drone this thing could apparently have done far more damage doing lots of conventional attacks (Voyager could not stop it and it ran for over a year on its own) rather than one big explosion. So the psychological power of such a weapon is in this story somehow translated into physical power?

Perhaps they could have made a better story if they had had Torres run across such a thing while on a supply run in a runabout and Voyager was unable to intercept the dreadnought before it reached its target. Then the dreadnought would have only had to have been slightly tougher (or faster) than a runabout rather than the uber war machine seen here, which maybe makes more tactical sense if it could deliver moon cracking power in its final move. This would have been obviously contrived but perhaps less of a plot hole.
The Kamikaze pilots were not really all that trained except in how to get the plane off the ground, fly it to a target and aim it. That was part of the reason the Japanese resorted to them. They had aircraft but most of their rigorously trained pilots were dead and could not be easily replaced with equivalently trained pilots.

I did not remember that Torres said it was a "kinetic" detonator that failed, which suggests it needed to physically hit the target to go off, but somehow that did not damage the Cardassian berserker (which would have been a better name than "Dreadnought" but they probably did not want to get into a copyright dispute with Saberhagen).
A managed democracy is a wonderful thing... for the managers... and its greatest strength is a 'free press' when 'free' is defined as 'responsible' and the managers define what is 'irresponsible'.”

― Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress
Imperator-zor
Redshirt
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2017 2:34 am

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by Imperator-zor »

Cardassian Engineers can't make an anti-matter bomb which blows up. Now that's some IMPRESSIVE bad engineering. It gets a Bloody Stupid Johnson award.

Zor
User avatar
PapaPalpatine
Officer
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:56 pm

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by PapaPalpatine »

I'm with Chuck on what the Voyager crew should've done with the Dreadnought: remove the warhead and keep it. It would be perfect to send into situations where they'd rather not risk Voyager being destroyed, doubly so if it was possible to remote pilot it from a console on the bridge. Hell, put some more weapons on it and use it as a beatstick against the Borg and some other hostile powers.
User avatar
Linkara
Officer
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 9:44 am

Re: Star Trek (VOY): Dreadnought

Post by Linkara »

It's just such a pity how the status quo was God so much on Voyager. I could see Voyager doing a Battlestar Galactica-style thing of leading a ragtag group of ships across the quadrant, some staying and some going occasionally - refugees, resource issues, a mini-Federation heading towards a place some called home and others wanted to make home.
Post Reply