CPAC Speaker Calls for Eradication of ‘Transgenderism’ — and Somehow Claims He’s Not Calling for Elimination of Transgen

[ProfessorDetective]

'There is no separating a ban on “transgenderism” from an attack on transgender people, says activist Erin Reed: “They are one and the same, and there’s no separation between them.”'

Do we need to say more?!

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... 234690924/

[hammerofglass]

I liked it better when they were pretending this was about bathrooms and highschool sports.

[Fuzzy Necromancer]

Well we all knew it was going to get here eventually.

[McAvoy]

I've said this for awhile. With homosexuality becoming more acceptable even among the conservatives, someone has to take their place.

Don't get me wrong, it can easily be reversed especially in this environment. But right now the whole 'mental illness' that is being trans is their focus. More so than homosexuality it seems.

[Fuzzy Necromancer]

They see transgender people as an easier target, and one that other members of the LGBTQ community might be willing to turn their backs on because it's not their problem. We need to prove them wrong.

[Mickey_Rat15]

'There is no separating a ban on “transgenderism” from an attack on transgender people, says activist Erin Reed: “They are one and the same, and there’s no separation between them.”'

Do we need to say more?!

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... 234690924/

In other words, if you are not fully in agreement with our ideological dogma, then you are an enemy.

Shorter version: If you are not with us, you are against us.

[hammerofglass]

That's like promising to eliminate left-handedness and then pretending you didn't threaten left-handed people.

Although these are the same lunatics who would happily insist left-handedness being natural is a liberal lie so probably a bad example.

[ProfessorDetective]

That's like promising to eliminate left-handedness and then pretending you didn't threaten left-handed people.

Although these are the same lunatics who would happily insist left-handedness being natural is a liberal lie so probably a bad example.

Wouldn't surprise me if that's on the bottom of the list for after they've worked through the usual minority groups. ALWAYS need an enemy.

[hammerofglass]

That's like promising to eliminate left-handedness and then pretending you didn't threaten left-handed people.

Although these are the same lunatics who would happily insist left-handedness being natural is a liberal lie so probably a bad example.

Wouldn't surprise me if that's on the bottom of the list for after they've worked through the usual minority groups. ALWAYS need an enemy.

They still had teachers beating anyone caught writing with their left hand back in what those folks consider the "good ol'days", I'm sure it's part of the package.

[Draco Dracul]

'There is no separating a ban on “transgenderism” from an attack on transgender people, says activist Erin Reed: “They are one and the same, and there’s no separation between them.”'

Do we need to say more?!

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... 234690924/

In other words, if you are not fully in agreement with our ideological dogma, then you are an enemy.

Shorter version: If you are not with us, you are against us.

A) Transgenderism is just a way of dehumanizing trans people by pretending there is some ideology rather than just something people are.
B)Even if the above was not true, there is no way to eliminate an ideology without killing a lot of people.