Right Wingers Committed Every 2018 Extremist Murder in USA

[BridgeConsoleMasher]

I actually remember the times around when I started to realize that argumentation gravitates two parties around a set of objective standards that weigh each position posited instead of simply one party playing their cards right in order to disestablish the integrity of an other and vice versa.

I don't really come with the personal attack first. it took me a while to think my signature is reasonable here.

Yep. Just don't say anything until someone tries to implicate you, then you can just cancel that out on the fly.

[Antiboyscout]

But...but...ANTIFA! SCARY BLACK MEN!!!!!!!

In all seriousness, I'm not surprised.

Logically speaking, this statistic doesn't make Antifa any better.

Um, it does. They don't murder people. Ever. It makes them better than the right wing extremists.
Unless you mean "doesn't make them any better than previously thought", in which case, what the flipping kung pow penis does that have to do with anything?

it's not for lack of trying

https://eugeneweekly.com/2019/01/24/new ... -shooting/

[Robovski]

I was reminded of this 2018 ''extremist'' murderer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_h ... s_shooting

[Karha of Honor]

I actually remember the times around when I started to realize that argumentation gravitates two parties around a set of objective standards that weigh each position posited instead of simply one party playing their cards right in order to disestablish the integrity of an other and vice versa.

I don't really come with the personal attack first. it took me a while to think my signature is reasonable here.

Yep. Just don't say anything until someone tries to implicate you, then you can just cancel that out on the fly.

Cancel that out?

[Admiral X]

I was reminded of this 2018 ''extremist'' murderer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_h ... s_shooting

To be fair, the only person she successfully killed was herself, but yeah, I think she serves pretty well to undermine the narrative that only white males do that kind of thing.

[BridgeConsoleMasher]

I actually remember the times around when I started to realize that argumentation gravitates two parties around a set of objective standards that weigh each position posited instead of simply one party playing their cards right in order to disestablish the integrity of an other and vice versa.

I don't really come with the personal attack first. it took me a while to think my signature is reasonable here.

Yep. Just don't say anything until someone tries to implicate you, then you can just cancel that out on the fly.

Cancel that out?

I've noticed a lot of people take part in personal argumentation strategically as if to defeat an opponent opposed to establishing a critical response to the cited situation.

[Karha of Honor]

I've noticed a lot of people take part in personal argumentation strategically as if to defeat an opponent opposed to establishing a critical response to the cited situation.

That is th e way i do it based on...?

[Draco Dracul]

I don't really get what your guys's argument points are.

i don't get lots of people but it does not really stop me.

Dunning Kruger at its finest and most distinguishing.

On the Internets everyone has the confident poker face.

Keep going despite not undersatanding what the heck the other is about is the engine of civilization.

I swear before 2014 i never met these i don't get, i mean i get it but i disagree so i say i don't get it people. Must be partisanship and Facebook bubbles.

I actually remember the times around when I started to realize that argumentation gravitates two parties around a set of objective standards that weigh each position posited instead of simply one party playing their cards right in order to disestablish the integrity of an other and vice versa.

Yes, but that was a quarter century ago as refusing the acknowledge that elected democrats have any kind of legitimacy has been a fairly open part of the Republican party since at least 1994.

[BridgeConsoleMasher]

I've noticed a lot of people take part in personal argumentation strategically as if to defeat an opponent opposed to establishing a critical response to the cited situation.

That is th e way i do it based on...?

I don't know I haven't really had any disputes with you.

I don't really get what your guys's argument points are.

i don't get lots of people but it does not really stop me.

Dunning Kruger at its finest and most distinguishing.

On the Internets everyone has the confident poker face.

Keep going despite not undersatanding what the heck the other is about is the engine of civilization.

I swear before 2014 i never met these i don't get, i mean i get it but i disagree so i say i don't get it people. Must be partisanship and Facebook bubbles.

I actually remember the times around when I started to realize that argumentation gravitates two parties around a set of objective standards that weigh each position posited instead of simply one party playing their cards right in order to disestablish the integrity of an other and vice versa.

Yes, but that was a quarter century ago as refusing the acknowledge that elected democrats have any kind of legitimacy has been a fairly open part of the Republican party since at least 1994.

I was only drawing upon past experience with more personal acquaintances from which squabbling is more common practice in a running relation. The behavior set adopted by people often shows an inability for someone to approach issues critically to an adequate degree.