The CisHets Are at it Again

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5655
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: The CisHets Are at it Again

Post by clearspira »

McAvoy wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:24 am
TGLS wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:45 am And a lot of people who learned the sex of their baby got surprised when their baby girl was actually a boy. So many little boys in pink...
Wouldn't have been a big a deal pre-50's. Pink being a stronger color than blue. That and there was a period that baby/toddler boys were photographed in dresses.

Or that men wore stockings or high heels. Or worse makeup or wigs.

Almost like fashion changes over time on what boys wear and what girls wear...
Whenever I see people arguing about shit like pink and blue, I like to imagine the Comedian from Watchmen shaking his head.
Antiboyscout
Captain
Posts: 1158
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:13 am

Re: The CisHets Are at it Again

Post by Antiboyscout »

GreyICE wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 10:31 am I'm not sure if you're applying right wing "logic" to the dishonest here, but it never works. They love playing the game of "try and drag the Overton window farther right",
Ah, accusing your enemy of what you yourself are doing. What exactly do you think turning "CISHET" into a slur is other than dragging the Overton window to the left?
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3876
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The CisHets Are at it Again

Post by McAvoy »

clearspira wrote: Sat Sep 12, 2020 1:14 pm
McAvoy wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:24 am
TGLS wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:45 am And a lot of people who learned the sex of their baby got surprised when their baby girl was actually a boy. So many little boys in pink...
Wouldn't have been a big a deal pre-50's. Pink being a stronger color than blue. That and there was a period that baby/toddler boys were photographed in dresses.

Or that men wore stockings or high heels. Or worse makeup or wigs.

Almost like fashion changes over time on what boys wear and what girls wear...
Whenever I see people arguing about shit like pink and blue, I like to imagine the Comedian from Watchmen shaking his head.
Tell me about it. Especially when we are talking about babies. Like babies care what they wear. Only parents do.
I got nothing to say here.
Post Reply