man arrested for child pornography hired to manage children at migrant detention center

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
User avatar
TGLS
Captain
Posts: 2931
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: man arrested for child pornography hired to manage children at migrant detention center

Post by TGLS »

Admiral X wrote: Tue Jul 10, 2018 5:27 am And since every background check I've ever seen has only asked for convictions, he would have cleared such a background check.
Apparently, some include arrests, and make note of whether the conviction, either pending, conviction or non-conviction. But the problem is a not guilty verdict is indistinguishable from the charges being dropped or expiring or whatever. Also, discriminating by arrests older than 7 years can get you in hot water.
Image
"I know what you’re thinking now. You’re thinking 'Oh my god, that’s treating other people with respect gone mad!'"
When I am writing in this font, I am writing in my moderator voice.
Spam-desu
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Re: man arrested for child pornography hired to manage children at migrant detention center

Post by Admiral X »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Tue Jul 10, 2018 5:31 am Man I really hope you are as rigorously devoted to freedom and the presumption of innocence when it comes to immigrants being detained without jury trial or defense council.
:roll: Guess you concede the point then if that's where you want to go.

So here goes. Everyone who is under reasonable suspicion of crime is detained prior to trail which can take months. If people have crossed the border illegally, they have broken the law. The process for determining this is the same as with any other crime. If they are seeking asylum, there is a process for that, and it takes time. Children are being separated from adults during this process, because (and it floors me that the rape-obsessed "progressives" don't seem to consider this) they may not actually be the children of the adults they were with, but may in fact be the victims of sex trafficking. That's due process in action there, so, yeah, I'm all about that.
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
Post Reply