Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

I'm still depressed that he hasn't been charged with treason and worried that the next coup will be better managed.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4822
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by CharlesPhipps »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 4:47 am I'm still depressed that he hasn't been charged with treason and worried that the next coup will be better managed.
The worst punishment for armed insurrection was 5 years.

Recently, registering to vote was punished with 6 years.
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4822
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by CharlesPhipps »

BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:06 pm I still haven't begun to absorb the idea of the possibility that the closest acting professional body to the president, chosen directly by the president, could somehow keep the president in power in our system of checks and balances.

Chris Christie has said that Trump surrounded himself with snake oil salesmen (which is apparent) who fed him dainty institutional information regarding Pence's authority, and I feel that acting on that would be a new low for Trump's intelligence, all of which I mostly have trouble comprehending.
I mean, Pence couldn't overturn the election. Dan Quayle of all people said it was impossible and if Trump TRIED to do it, they would have had to have escorted him out and it would be up to the cops and military to support the President (Joe Biden).

But he thought he could because there's never been a situation Trump didn't think by saying he won instead of lost didn't work out because of his lawyers or money.
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:38 am
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:06 pm I still haven't begun to absorb the idea of the possibility that the closest acting professional body to the president, chosen directly by the president, could somehow keep the president in power in our system of checks and balances.

Chris Christie has said that Trump surrounded himself with snake oil salesmen (which is apparent) who fed him dainty institutional information regarding Pence's authority, and I feel that acting on that would be a new low for Trump's intelligence, all of which I mostly have trouble comprehending.
I mean, Pence couldn't overturn the election. Dan Quayle of all people said it was impossible and if Trump TRIED to do it, they would have had to have escorted him out and it would be up to the cops and military to support the President (Joe Biden).

But he thought he could because there's never been a situation Trump didn't think by saying he won instead of lost didn't work out because of his lawyers or money.
Yes that's what we've been talking about for 5 years really. At this point, Trump talking about it serves mainly to rile up his constituency in the form of people that live under a rock and don't care to know any better. That or they will agree that the system is broken because of that and will vote for him in order to reform the system.
..What mirror universe?
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4822
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by CharlesPhipps »

BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 4:30 pm Yes that's what we've been talking about for 5 years really. At this point, Trump talking about it serves mainly to rile up his constituency in the form of people that live under a rock and don't care to know any better. That or they will agree that the system is broken because of that and will vote for him in order to reform the system.
I'm not sure I'd want to live in a system where reform is, "I don't care what the majority or the law thinks if I lose."
User avatar
ProfessorDetective
Captain
Posts: 1444
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 3:40 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN, USA

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by ProfessorDetective »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:34 pm
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 4:30 pm Yes that's what we've been talking about for 5 years really. At this point, Trump talking about it serves mainly to rile up his constituency in the form of people that live under a rock and don't care to know any better. That or they will agree that the system is broken because of that and will vote for him in order to reform the system.
I'm not sure I'd want to live in a system where reform is, "I don't care what the majority or the law thinks if I lose."
Or, to paraphrase the right-wings most consistent platform: "forget you, I WILL get mine".
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:34 pm
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 4:30 pm Yes that's what we've been talking about for 5 years really. At this point, Trump talking about it serves mainly to rile up his constituency in the form of people that live under a rock and don't care to know any better. That or they will agree that the system is broken because of that and will vote for him in order to reform the system.
I'm not sure I'd want to live in a system where reform is, "I don't care what the majority or the law thinks if I lose."
We basically saw the GOP go through their own micro fallout to fascism.
..What mirror universe?
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:38 am
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:06 pm I still haven't begun to absorb the idea of the possibility that the closest acting professional body to the president, chosen directly by the president, could somehow keep the president in power in our system of checks and balances.

Chris Christie has said that Trump surrounded himself with snake oil salesmen (which is apparent) who fed him dainty institutional information regarding Pence's authority, and I feel that acting on that would be a new low for Trump's intelligence, all of which I mostly have trouble comprehending.
I mean, Pence couldn't overturn the election. Dan Quayle of all people said it was impossible and if Trump TRIED to do it, they would have had to have escorted him out and it would be up to the cops and military to support the President (Joe Biden).

But he thought he could because there's never been a situation Trump didn't think by saying he won instead of lost didn't work out because of his lawyers or money.
I dunno man, I don't know what's possible any more. I spent the four years of 45's presidency learning that lots of things we thought were enforceable laws had just been gentleman's agreements that anyone with enough chutzpah could just ignore.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4822
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by CharlesPhipps »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:46 pm I dunno man, I don't know what's possible any more. I spent the four years of 45's presidency learning that lots of things we thought were enforceable laws had just been gentleman's agreements that anyone with enough chutzpah could just ignore.
I feel that "the person elected President is not the President" is one of those things that should be enforced against with guns.
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Police prepared for January 6th attack-- they prepared for Anti-Trump protestors

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:46 pm
CharlesPhipps wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:38 am
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:06 pm I still haven't begun to absorb the idea of the possibility that the closest acting professional body to the president, chosen directly by the president, could somehow keep the president in power in our system of checks and balances.

Chris Christie has said that Trump surrounded himself with snake oil salesmen (which is apparent) who fed him dainty institutional information regarding Pence's authority, and I feel that acting on that would be a new low for Trump's intelligence, all of which I mostly have trouble comprehending.
I mean, Pence couldn't overturn the election. Dan Quayle of all people said it was impossible and if Trump TRIED to do it, they would have had to have escorted him out and it would be up to the cops and military to support the President (Joe Biden).

But he thought he could because there's never been a situation Trump didn't think by saying he won instead of lost didn't work out because of his lawyers or money.
I dunno man, I don't know what's possible any more. I spent the four years of 45's presidency learning that lots of things we thought were enforceable laws had just been gentleman's agreements that anyone with enough chutzpah could just ignore.
What's your take now?

I can't say it wasn't ugly. I didn't really know how the investigation was going to turn out, but I never thought of anything he did as a smoking gun really.
..What mirror universe?
Post Reply