The constitution does not outline human rights. It outlines some rights of U.S. citizens. Court cases have not concluded that illegal immigrants or asylum seekers are given all the rights of U.S. citizens, though the constitution "follows the flag" to some extent.CmdrKing wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:18 am Little Raven: nah. I’m arguing that Trump camps are concentration camps even by your “must be Nazi tier” definition. As suggested in the unquoted portion of my post, I consider what the Canadians are doing deeply unethical as well, but I am willing to accept that they don’t rise to the level of Dachau, which apparently is our bar for this conversation.
Darth: your argument hinges on the premise that, as non-citizens, the people in these camps do not deserve full human rights as outlined in the US constitution. When you exclude a group from human rights, you exclude them from humanity.
It’s not a straw man, it’s stating clearly the required beliefs to hold that position. If it seems monstrous, *change your position*
Also, the right to free travel is abridged for many people in the U.S., some of whom have committed crimes, but they are not considered less than human.
Your logic is based on false premises and proceeds from them through faulty reasoning to arrive at conclusions the downright silliness of which should surprise nobody.