Speaking of MeToo (and I apologise if this was already covered but I am not looking back through so many pages) Joe Biden having so many women come out against him has been very conveniently timed. Maybe he did do it, but these claims weren't last year, or the year before that, or six months ago. They were just after he - by many polls - overtook Bernie.Captain Crimson wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 5:02 amKinda like how I suppose MeToo, just not the excesses that can lead to abuse. All systems of power and a movement for change can have that. They just need to rein the excesses in. Because I support giving victims a voice. Having a big giant company fire a worker over that, less so. Let it go to trial if it has to be done, then decide what to do. But then the big corps have always at times fired workers if it suits PR purposes, and show no signs of stopping anytime soon. So it has to be done. Necessary evil, I'd say.BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:31 amWell I was probably coming off a bit strong for it being a toxic movement or something. As was stated by someone earlier it was largely misunderstanding backlash. Albeit while the overall message especially in the confines of how you convey it is reasonable, the use of it was specifically an argument against the BLM protests, and not directed at any chains of civil authority, figuratively speaking or otherwise.Captain Crimson wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:13 amI think focusing on the unarmed people shot by police is important. Let us not forget it affects white people though. Does it affect black people disproportionately? You could definitely make that case. But it's both BS and it's something that has to stop.
All and all though it really was just more of a misunderstanding, even as far as I experienced it with people I know, but the take was so misguided.
Herm...