Coronavirus - the new pandemic
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
I'd say it's more on vaccine rejecters than people who get vaccinated. People who believe vaccines are good at least clear an admittedly ankle-height bar.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Gotta love how believing in science is considered a negative in some circles.Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 11:25 pm I'd say it's more on vaccine rejecters than people who get vaccinated. People who believe vaccines are good at least clear an admittedly ankle-height bar.
I got nothing to say here.
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Science is neither a religion nor an ideology; it doesn't require "belief".
It does need to be practiced, and there are quite a few people who give it lip service while ignoring the actual science.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Yes. Tell me something else I do know.Frustration wrote: ↑Fri Mar 18, 2022 11:47 pmScience is neither a religion nor an ideology; it doesn't require "belief".
It does need to be practiced, and there are quite a few people who give it lip service while ignoring the actual science.
In a world where science is accepted throughout there would be no need to say I believe in science. It would be just accepted. Belief implies accepting something in that has no evidence, having faith.
Which in general gives their is some religious undertone in science which it shouldn't.
Why do we say believe in science then? Probably because we have to say believe in climate change, belive in evolution, believe in a greater much older universe of billions and billions of worlds.
So we got people who reject that, reject science and believe in something else, always based on religion.
It's OK to be skeptical about science obviously. That's part of science. Not OK to be skeptical about let's say gravity because you can't see it. Or that the most accepted theory of why dinosaurs died was due to an asteroid but to be skeptical because no one witnessed it?
Covid just showcased how many people distrust science because it's always changing. Ideas that was thought to work may not work and therefore all of the following science afterwards should be suspect as well. Doesn't help it is political as hell now.
Funny thing is the trend of climate change. Originally, those in the camp of its not 'real' are rapidly diminishing. As in nowadays its accepted the climate change is happening but not because humans are doing it.
So yes there is a belief in science. Most people who are into science don't believe in it, they accept it. Even if they have no knowledge of how science got from point A to point B or more realistically point P-12A-3.
I got nothing to say here.
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Yet you ignore the actual research findings about the nature of the efficacy of Covid vaccines, and persist in acting as though they had properties they do not.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11631
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
I don't see anybody ever arguing that vaccines are fully effective. It's never an argument by the scientific community.Frustration wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 5:23 pm Yet you ignore the actual research findings about the nature of the efficacy of Covid vaccines, and persist in acting as though they had properties they do not.
It's also not the same as misinformation arguing against the efficacy or warning of the dangers of vaccines.
..What mirror universe?
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
It's not an issue of their being "fully effective"?
Why do you keep arguing against ridiculous strawmen, instead of arguing against the actual issue of contention? (Besides the obvious reason that you don't want to acknowledge, of course.)
Why do you keep arguing against ridiculous strawmen, instead of arguing against the actual issue of contention? (Besides the obvious reason that you don't want to acknowledge, of course.)
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Well, after rolling back protective measures, the virus is spiking again. Like yiffing clockwork.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11631
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
It's my recollection of what you've said about vaccines. That they're not fully effective and that people think they are.Frustration wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 5:31 pm It's not an issue of their being "fully effective"?
Why do you keep arguing against ridiculous strawmen, instead of arguing against the actual issue of contention? (Besides the obvious reason that you don't want to acknowledge, of course.)
If that's not it, then what is it you're on specifically please? I believe you also cited inflated case numbers but did not provide sources on it.
..What mirror universe?
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Never said any of that.Frustration wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 5:23 pm Yet you ignore the actual research findings about the nature of the efficacy of Covid vaccines, and persist in acting as though they had properties they do not.
Good job though on the red herring.
I got nothing to say here.