Honestly, this is why I'm very forgiving when it comes to the current Star Trek series, they're not perfect and even I've talk about what they could have improved on, but right from the start each series has tried to be different from past Star Trek and do something new, whether it's a serialised story structured story with consequences like with Discovery and Picard, building upon and showing consequences to past events like in Picard, or showing a new side to the Star Trek universe like with Picard and lower Decks, or simply moving forward in the timeline and showing us a new era with new rules like with Picard and Discovery.Makeshift Python wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:29 am On that regard, I actually blame them all. The angry vocal fans that have been entitled since 1999, Abrams for his lack of imagination, and Disney for rushing the film instead of giving it the time it needed especially in light of Fisher's passing.
The original draft by Trevororo (however you spell his name) wasn't perfect but it at least felt like it was trying to aim for something new and could have been something to build off of. Instead Abrams threw it all away so he could just replay the beats of ROTJ and that IMO hurt the sequel trilogy far more than anything else.
While season one of Discovery isn't perfect, I appreciate that it ripped the plaster off right away and wasn't going to live in nostalgia and the shadow of the series that came before, I dread to think was would have happened if after 12 years of waiting for new Trek, all we got was The Next Generation but with an unfamiliar cast and better effects, much like how The Next Generation was to The Original Series when that started, or if Picard was just season 8 of The Next Generation and was an entire season of "These Are the Voyages...".
Star Trek is able to do what Star Wars hasn't been willing to do from the start, move forward.