That's why I go with the non-cishet... Well, non-cisALLOhet, now (turns out, asexuality runs on its own spectrum, 'allosexual' meaning 'those who experience sexual attraction of any kind'). It covers the vast majority of the community (non-cisgendered, non-allosexual, and/or, non-heterosexual, folks), is less than five syllables, and should only have negative connotations to the type of people who want people that the term applies to not exist anymore (so, no one worth bothering with).Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 09, 2020 7:28 am Por Que No Los Dos?
It's not so much about "Reclaiming" the word as it being something we've had for a long while, and it's stuck, and it's academically useful, and sometimes it's more efficient than a long string of letters, and whenever we try to come up with some other umbrella term the radical squad starts raising cane and makes a big fuss about it and we circle back. Remember MOGAI?
For my part, I'm working to make progress in both areas. LGBTQIAP human protagonists and LGBTQIAP werewolves and half-angels and whatnot are in my published works.
It's not as snappy as... the other term, but finding a good, succinct one to encompass such a wide, disparate, assortment of people (that doesn't involve just listing them off) isn't easy. I am trying though.