Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

For anything and everything that's not already covered in the other forums. Except for that which is forbidden. Check the forum guidelines to make sure or risk the wrath of the warrior cobalt tarantulas!
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by Karha of Honor »

clearspira wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:02 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 7:44 pm
clearspira wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 3:56 pm
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:44 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:26 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:23 am
Why is it sad? What's so wrong with retconning evolution?

In what jobs or social situations does it matter that someone did it?
Because it's not true and if you really are sincerely religious, you should not fear the truth. It also causes a distrust of science which can lead you to disregarding medical advice which can get people killed or horribly injured or untreatd.
People will fear the truth all the time no matter what ideas they have in their heads. I fail to see why it makes you ignore doctors.
Because evolution is true and creationism isn't? That is good enough for me. It made sense to believe in all of this nonsense before electricity was developed (I guess), but we've moved on now and disproved all of this nonsense. I frankly I could not care less what you fear, all I care about is that people stop teaching kids nonsense.
(How many more times I wonder can I press that this is all nonsense without overusing the word?)
There a re relevant and irrelevant truths. if Evolution gets retconned with God or not is fucking irrelevant to pretty much everything.
As an atheist, I find the idea that theists can just casually retcon their religion to be weird. The omnipotent supreme being couldn't explain himself properly the first time round?
If he is omnipotent he is hard to interpret.

Image
Image
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by clearspira »

Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:14 am
clearspira wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:02 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 7:44 pm
clearspira wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 3:56 pm
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:44 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:26 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:23 am
Why is it sad? What's so wrong with retconning evolution?

In what jobs or social situations does it matter that someone did it?
Because it's not true and if you really are sincerely religious, you should not fear the truth. It also causes a distrust of science which can lead you to disregarding medical advice which can get people killed or horribly injured or untreatd.
People will fear the truth all the time no matter what ideas they have in their heads. I fail to see why it makes you ignore doctors.
Because evolution is true and creationism isn't? That is good enough for me. It made sense to believe in all of this nonsense before electricity was developed (I guess), but we've moved on now and disproved all of this nonsense. I frankly I could not care less what you fear, all I care about is that people stop teaching kids nonsense.
(How many more times I wonder can I press that this is all nonsense without overusing the word?)
There a re relevant and irrelevant truths. if Evolution gets retconned with God or not is fucking irrelevant to pretty much everything.
As an atheist, I find the idea that theists can just casually retcon their religion to be weird. The omnipotent supreme being couldn't explain himself properly the first time round?
If he is omnipotent he is hard to interpret.

Image
Which is not true though. If you are omnipotent then you have the capability to make others understand completely and absolutely what you mean. That is the very definition of being able to do literally anything.
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by Karha of Honor »

clearspira wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:25 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:14 am
clearspira wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:02 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 7:44 pm
clearspira wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 3:56 pm
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:44 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:26 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:23 am
Why is it sad? What's so wrong with retconning evolution?

In what jobs or social situations does it matter that someone did it?
Because it's not true and if you really are sincerely religious, you should not fear the truth. It also causes a distrust of science which can lead you to disregarding medical advice which can get people killed or horribly injured or untreatd.
People will fear the truth all the time no matter what ideas they have in their heads. I fail to see why it makes you ignore doctors.
Because evolution is true and creationism isn't? That is good enough for me. It made sense to believe in all of this nonsense before electricity was developed (I guess), but we've moved on now and disproved all of this nonsense. I frankly I could not care less what you fear, all I care about is that people stop teaching kids nonsense.
(How many more times I wonder can I press that this is all nonsense without overusing the word?)
There a re relevant and irrelevant truths. if Evolution gets retconned with God or not is fucking irrelevant to pretty much everything.
As an atheist, I find the idea that theists can just casually retcon their religion to be weird. The omnipotent supreme being couldn't explain himself properly the first time round?
If he is omnipotent he is hard to interpret.

Image
Which is not true though. If you are omnipotent then you have the capability to make others understand completely and absolutely what you mean. That is the very definition of being able to do literally anything.
How do you know? You are not omnipotent.
Image
User avatar
TGLS
Captain
Posts: 2953
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by TGLS »

Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:43 amHow do you know? You are not omnipotent.
Omnipotence means you have unlimited power. If you're omnipotent, you by definition, are able to make yourself completely clear right off the bat.
Image
"I know what you’re thinking now. You’re thinking 'Oh my god, that’s treating other people with respect gone mad!'"
When I am writing in this font, I am writing in my moderator voice.
Spam-desu
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by Karha of Honor »

TGLS wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:09 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:43 amHow do you know? You are not omnipotent.
Omnipotence means you have unlimited power. If you're omnipotent, you by definition, are able to make yourself completely clear right off the bat.
But you don't have to ebcause you are omnipotent.
Image
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 4101
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by Madner Kami »

Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:17 am
TGLS wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:09 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:43 amHow do you know? You are not omnipotent.
Omnipotence means you have unlimited power. If you're omnipotent, you by definition, are able to make yourself completely clear right off the bat.
But you don't have to ebcause you are omnipotent.
So the proposed being is just fucking about and around with everyone? That's a great interpretation of Christianity, Judaism and Islam and I completely agree: There's a jackass at the helm.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by clearspira »

Madner Kami wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 7:54 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:17 am
TGLS wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:09 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:43 amHow do you know? You are not omnipotent.
Omnipotence means you have unlimited power. If you're omnipotent, you by definition, are able to make yourself completely clear right off the bat.
But you don't have to ebcause you are omnipotent.
So the proposed being is just fucking about and around with everyone? That's a great interpretation of Christianity, Judaism and Islam and I completely agree: There's a jackass at the helm.
Beat me to it Madner Kami. And how is ''you don't have to'' an excuse for anything? What about simple decency to others?
Antiboyscout
Captain
Posts: 1158
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:13 am

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by Antiboyscout »

TGLS wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:09 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:43 amHow do you know? You are not omnipotent.
Omnipotence means you have unlimited power. If you're omnipotent, you by definition, are able to make yourself completely clear right off the bat.
First, just because God does not follow your morality does not make God immoral. You wish to dictate to others instead of letting them figure out things on their own. God cannot be because God does not make the decisions I would is the height of arrogance.

Second, can God create something too heavy for God to lift? Why does omnipotence create this inherent contradiction? Maybe the problem is not with God but with the term.
User avatar
TGLS
Captain
Posts: 2953
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by TGLS »

Antiboyscout wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:08 am
TGLS wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:09 am
Slash Gallagher wrote: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:43 amHow do you know? You are not omnipotent.
Omnipotence means you have unlimited power. If you're omnipotent, you by definition, are able to make yourself completely clear right off the bat.
First, just because God does not follow your morality does not make God immoral. You wish to dictate to others instead of letting them figure out things on their own. God cannot be because God does not make the decisions I would is the height of arrogance.

Second, can God create something too heavy for God to lift? Why does omnipotence create this inherent contradiction? Maybe the problem is not with God but with the term.
First, the problem isn't about morality. The problem is that all these scriptures say that they are perfect and divinely inspired or written. If a god is omnipotent, the scripture is self-declared to be perfect, and there are all kinds of errors that need to be explained, the only conclusion following the premises is that they didn't want to be clear to begin with. This leads to a pile of other questions (particularly if being honest is one of the things the scripture says to do).

Second:
Image
http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/3413.html
Image
"I know what you’re thinking now. You’re thinking 'Oh my god, that’s treating other people with respect gone mad!'"
When I am writing in this font, I am writing in my moderator voice.
Spam-desu
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Re: Quillette: Progressive Creationism: A Review of ‘A Dangerous Idea’

Post by Admiral X »

Shit like this is why I'm basically an apathetic agnostic.
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
Post Reply