Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

For anything and everything that's not already covered in the other forums. Except for that which is forbidden. Check the forum guidelines to make sure or risk the wrath of the warrior cobalt tarantulas!
ChiggyvonRichthofen
Captain
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by ChiggyvonRichthofen »

Ebert gave each of the original trilogy 4 out of 4. He called Empire Strikes Back the best of the trilogy, but that review came years later during the rereleases before TPM. Siskel did give a positive review at the time.

Siskel and Ebert weren't particularly disdainful of sci-fi from what I've seen, but as "mainstream" reviewers I wouldn't expect their interests or perspective to line up with those of hardcore sci-fi fans. The disparity between critic and fan reaction toward The Last Jedi is one of the more extreme recent examples I can think of where two different audiences emphasize different things.
The owls are not what they seem.
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Yukaphile »

Well, thank God.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
Post Reply