Holier-than-thou virtue-signaling on the left?

[BridgeConsoleMasher]

Oh, to be clear, for someone to be guilty *in the eyes of the law* and subject to all penalties thereof, yes, there should be a trial and that trial must be conducted on a presumption of innocence.

In a simple matter of what, factually, went on, the evidence available is sufficient to logically conclude what happened does meet the threshold for war crimes.

To put it another way, let’s borrow killing someone on camera in a public broadcast example. The US’ position would be equivalent to saying “yeah, we killed someone, but it wasn’t murder because we were working security at the time and it was important.” And then saying that they’re retired now so it’s the new guy’s problem anyway.

Alright alright, what do we got on him?