An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Fuzzy Necromancer · Post by **Fuzzy Necromancer** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 4:12 am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtfBcTvcilo

BridgeConsoleMasher · Post by **BridgeConsoleMasher** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:31 am

Well I'm fairly certain that everyone in the administration farts as much as the general person. A few people here and there might have some irregularities, but you can never tell for sure with this kind of thing.

Karha of Honor · Post by **Karha of Honor** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:43 pm

History will judge as some good + bad and a huge missed opportunity.

clearspira · Post by **clearspira** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:14 pm

Very few people are capable of true objectivity is my experience.

Karha of Honor · Post by **Karha of Honor** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:38 pm

clearspira wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:14 pm Very few people are capable of true objectivity is my experience.

The OP was not branded that way.

Darth Wedgius · Post by **Darth Wedgius** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:36 pm

This might be what some people honestly think is "objective" and "factually accurate." We're in an era where even some academics in the left are openly questioning objectivity.

BridgeConsoleMasher · Post by **BridgeConsoleMasher** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Why worry about objectivity when you can just point to people on social media to lambast the other side?

Yukaphile · Post by **Yukaphile** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:43 pm

Clearspira is absolutely right. With that said, Trump hasn't been the worst President in our history. Seriously. He's only "the worst" in that he has no control over his mouth and deliberately likes to troll people, but in terms of laws passed and actions taken, he's not that high.

Fuzzy Necromancer · Post by **Fuzzy Necromancer** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:44 pm

Darth Wedgius wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:36 pm This might be what some people honestly think is "objective" and "factually accurate." We're in an era where even some academics in the left are openly questioning objectivity.

Then, let me clarify by saying the use of "Factual" and "objective" here are facetious/sarcastic/etc.

Does that help?

Darth Wedgius · Post by **Darth Wedgius** » Sun Apr 21, 2019 12:13 am

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:44 pm
Darth Wedgius wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:36 pm This might be what some people honestly think is "objective" and "factually accurate." We're in an era where even some academics in the left are openly questioning objectivity.
Then, let me clarify by saying the use of "Factual" and "objective" here are facetious/sarcastic/etc. Does that help?

Not really -- though I phrased that badly (mea culpa), by "some people" I wasn't including you. But there are those will take "authenticity" and "lived experiences" as the best data out there.

*Sfdebris.net

An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration

Re: An Objective and Factually Accurate Assesment of 45's Presidential Administration