Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

For anything and everything that's not already covered in the other forums. Except for that which is forbidden. Check the forum guidelines to make sure or risk the wrath of the warrior cobalt tarantulas!
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Yukaphile »

Personally, I think they're snobs. Roger Ebert in particularly I cannot stand to the point I actually feel satisfied to know he's dead. Very few people have I ever felt that for.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Deledrius
Captain
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:24 pm

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Deledrius »

Ebert had a poor understanding of Star Trek (from the reviews I recall reading) and was very ignorant on the topic of video games (but that didn't stop him from chiming in on them). His reaction to The Black Cauldron will always make me happy, though.
User avatar
Mecha82
Captain
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:42 am
Location: Finland

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Mecha82 »

I think that they were really good and funny duo. They made they movie reviews actually entertaining to watch. So basically I agree with Doug Walker about those two.
"In the embrace of the great Nurgle, I am no longer afraid, for with His pestilential favour I have become that which I once most feared: Death.."
- Kulvain Hestarius of the Death Guard
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Yukaphile »

Entertainment does not equal to intelligence - or compassion.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
ChiggyvonRichthofen
Captain
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by ChiggyvonRichthofen »

I never really watched them on tv, but I occasionally check out Ebert's reviews online after I watch a film. He had his blind spots and his rating system wasn't perfect, but he was a talented writer and could really get at the heart of why certain films were special (or terrible). Plus I appreciate that the guy just loved movies. Maybe watching him on tv was a different experience.

Do you have an example in mind as far as the implied lack of compassion? If anything one of Ebert's drawbacks was that he sometimes adopted a moralistic or sentimental stance on certain ostensibly edgy films, when a more detached view would have allowed him to see what the director's intentions actually were.
The owls are not what they seem.
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Yukaphile »

You can private message me. I don't feel like sharing it here.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Karha of Honor »

Yukaphile wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 3:27 am You can private message me. I don't feel like sharing it here.
You shared far worse.
Image
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Yukaphile »

Well, it should be obvious I am trying to reform, duh.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by Yukaphile »

One thing I'm wondering... what was their review for Empire Strikes Back? I know critics didn't like it, and I'm willing to bet they were among the initially confused critics wondering why this was not A New Hope 2.0.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
pilight
Officer
Posts: 330
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 3:08 pm

Re: Thoughts on Siskel and Ebert?

Post by pilight »

Roger Ebert tried to judge films by their own standards; if it's a western then how good of a western is it? Gene Siskel looked for movies to transcend their genres; will this western appeal to people who aren't aficionados of westerns?

Ebert preferred films that didn't require people to have background knowledge before watching them. That's why he sometimes had wildly different opinions of genre films than people well versed in the source material (The Phantom Menace, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead, etc).

That said, I could usually tell from his reviews whether I would like a film regardless of whether he liked it.
Post Reply