A philosophical question - life, death, murder?
Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2019 8:54 pm
Here's a question I want to pose to you all. If people were to ever conclusively piece together what happens to that essence that composes us after our body decays, well, would people suddenly think murder or killing is that bad? What impact would it have on us as a society? See, for me personally, I believe there are things you can do to somebody in this life that's worse than killing them. It scars them for life, leaves them as damaged, crippled people who were never the same as they once were. Yet we as a collective society consider murder the worst sin. Even killing, in self-defense, has that same association. Torture and sexual abuse seems to take a backseat to that. And I think it's because in the end, we don't know, and it's our fear of the unknown and our own fallibility that contributes a lot to that. So what if some scientist had blasted through the universe and found God? Learned there is an afterlife that we pass on to? And yeah, in this case, it depends what kind of afterlife, I'll give you that. Or, in the second scenario, definitively concluded nothing happens, we cease to exist, that it's one big nothing after we pass on?
What impact do you think that would have on our society? I think it'd change a lot of societal views. Of course, I think in the first scenario, a lot of religiously-minded people would accept it as confirmation. Then again, there's also those other religions that would take issue because it's not their God. So it'd be a mixed bag. I think atheists, if the science is sound, would accept it, while some probably would not. But what impact would it have on our crime rate, criminal justice system, and so on? How do you punish somebody for murder when, say, you have absolute proof they didn't "die" in the sense we think of it today? That they effectively continued on in another form? Same for the second scenario.
I really wanna hear your guys' thoughts on this.
What impact do you think that would have on our society? I think it'd change a lot of societal views. Of course, I think in the first scenario, a lot of religiously-minded people would accept it as confirmation. Then again, there's also those other religions that would take issue because it's not their God. So it'd be a mixed bag. I think atheists, if the science is sound, would accept it, while some probably would not. But what impact would it have on our crime rate, criminal justice system, and so on? How do you punish somebody for murder when, say, you have absolute proof they didn't "die" in the sense we think of it today? That they effectively continued on in another form? Same for the second scenario.
I really wanna hear your guys' thoughts on this.