Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
Thebestoftherest
Captain
Posts: 3513
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:22 pm

Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Thebestoftherest »

https://sfdebris.com/videos/startrek/s005.php

Opinionated Star Trek Episode Guide sees Kirk confront the only person manly enough to take him on: another Kirk! And slashfic writers promptly faint.
Mickey_Rat15
Officer
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:26 pm

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Mickey_Rat15 »

My thought here is that "Yellow" Kirk is entirely id. There really is very little restraining him from indulging his passion of the moment. The combined Kirk seems to me to be the Ego. What it says about human nature seems fundamentally right, it takes a certain amount of ruthless impulsiveness to come to a weighty decision, especially when one does not know the outcome. That some of the human qualities that can lead to evil outcomes also make the good possible when tempered by conscience.
A managed democracy is a wonderful thing... for the managers... and its greatest strength is a 'free press' when 'free' is defined as 'responsible' and the managers define what is 'irresponsible'.”

― Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress
Thebestoftherest
Captain
Posts: 3513
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:22 pm

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Thebestoftherest »

I have to asked, why couldn't they beam the away team up sedated them and confined them to various quarters where they can't hurt themselves or others.
Swiftbow
Officer
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Swiftbow »

Thebestoftherest wrote: Sun Oct 31, 2021 1:19 am I have to asked, why couldn't they beam the away team up sedated them and confined them to various quarters where they can't hurt themselves or others.
They would have been split into two halves also, with no guaranteed means of putting them back together. (That is, it might have been a death sentence.)

Perhaps they'd do that if there was no hope left on the surface. But that hadn't quite happened yet.
User avatar
CrypticMirror
Captain
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:15 am

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by CrypticMirror »

I wonder why they couldn't use a shuttle, other than, of course, the production team hadn't thought of having shuttles at that point. In-universe, I headcanon it as Starfleet having had such success with transporter tech they got a bit cocky and declared shuttles an obsolete technology (like lifeboats on the Titanic) and withdrew them from service, only for, after this and other transporter problems, to hurriedly re-issue them to all ships. I used the example of the Titanic lifeboats, but there is no shortage of other such cock ups.
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 3961
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Madner Kami »

So they designed and constructed the Constitution-class and other ships with a huge shuttlebay and then put no shuttles inside?
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
Mickey_Rat15
Officer
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:26 pm

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Mickey_Rat15 »

CrypticMirror wrote: Sun Oct 31, 2021 12:31 pm I wonder why they couldn't use a shuttle, other than, of course, the production team hadn't thought of having shuttles at that point. In-universe, I headcanon it as Starfleet having had such success with transporter tech they got a bit cocky and declared shuttles an obsolete technology (like lifeboats on the Titanic) and withdrew them from service, only for, after this and other transporter problems, to hurriedly re-issue them to all ships. I used the example of the Titanic lifeboats, but there is no shortage of other such cock ups.
I had thought it was because the production team had not finished the models for a shuttle when the episode was shot (as this was among the first episodes produced), so they ignored that the Enterprise should have small craft.
A managed democracy is a wonderful thing... for the managers... and its greatest strength is a 'free press' when 'free' is defined as 'responsible' and the managers define what is 'irresponsible'.”

― Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress
Lazerlike42
Officer
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2021 3:03 am

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Lazerlike42 »

It's the same reason that 90% of the plots in the first couple of seasons of Enterprise could have been entirely skipped if they had just been willing to use the transporters on people - and this is after they'd already done it a few times. It made no sense in Enterprise to have people in life or death situations and not use the transporter and it makes no sense in this episode to not use the shuttle. It's just an oversight for the sake of the writers/production team being able to tell the story they want to.
cdrood
Officer
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 4:05 pm

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by cdrood »

One reason I'd rate the episode higher is that it's so enjoyable, despite the in-universe inconsistency. The concept is played out so well that even after multiple viewings, you don't care that much about the shuttles. It doesn't take you out of the story.
Thebestoftherest
Captain
Posts: 3513
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:22 pm

Re: Star Trek (TOS): The Enemy Within

Post by Thebestoftherest »

I find chuck theory funny.
Post Reply