Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
Given how many things have gone wrong for Chuck while he played DA2 what do you want to bet that this copy of DA2 was build on a Indian burial ground and soon enough he will see twin girls asking him to come play with them.
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
Chuck saying he used to dislike DA2 before all this. I was reminded of a line from GI Joe by Scarlet "I used to hate spiders, now I LOATH them."
I don't really play many modern games so I don't have much context (I have played a little Mass Effect 2...).
I hope these external problems can smooth over in the final installments, but I guess we will see.
I don't really play many modern games so I don't have much context (I have played a little Mass Effect 2...).
I hope these external problems can smooth over in the final installments, but I guess we will see.
Yours Truly,
Allan Olley
"It is with philosophy as with religion : men marvel at the absurdity of other people's tenets, while exactly parallel absurdities remain in their own." John Stuart Mill
Allan Olley
"It is with philosophy as with religion : men marvel at the absurdity of other people's tenets, while exactly parallel absurdities remain in their own." John Stuart Mill
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
Rhianna Pratchett had nothing to do with Dragon Age 2, going by my admittedly-quick research. Somehow I suspect the game would've had a better story if she had...
Also, can't wait for the final videos, but I admit one point of serious dissension.
Chuck calling Merrill a villain.
Merrill is the sweetest most adorable mage ever and I will go STEVE SMASH to defend her. 
(To clarify, when he was grumbling about the four romance choices, and summed up Merrill as the one who summons demons, and who in other works would thus be a villain.)
P.S. Edit: As for the blood mage issue, given what we learn about red lyrium and lyrium itself in DAI and DAI:Descent... I'd argue that blood magic being "evil" is entirely due to psychological effects, not some innate use of it.
Also, can't wait for the final videos, but I admit one point of serious dissension.
Chuck calling Merrill a villain.


(To clarify, when he was grumbling about the four romance choices, and summed up Merrill as the one who summons demons, and who in other works would thus be a villain.)
P.S. Edit: As for the blood mage issue, given what we learn about red lyrium and lyrium itself in DAI and DAI:Descent... I'd argue that blood magic being "evil" is entirely due to psychological effects, not some innate use of it.
"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia
Administrator of SFD, Former Spacebattles Super-Mod, Veteran Chatnik. And multiverse crossover-loving writer, of course!
Administrator of SFD, Former Spacebattles Super-Mod, Veteran Chatnik. And multiverse crossover-loving writer, of course!
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
One positive bit I will give to DA2 is that it gave the series it's own sense of style, both in it's visuals and how it was filmed. As great as DAO is the overall look of it was rather bland, in my opinion, and due to the limitations the way it was "filmed" wasn't that interesting while DA2 gave Dragon Age a more unique look that helped it stand out and is still being used for the series to this day. The way the cutscenes were handled was also a lot more interesting then DAO, I love how Flemith is revealed after saving Hawke and her family, or how we transition to Cassandra and Varric as he is explaining the story all helped to give DA2 a real cinematic feel to it and I'm glad that DAI decided to keep DA2's style while also returning to the series roots by making it more about the player and how they shape the world of Thadus.
-
- Officer
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 6:39 am
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
Even as someone who really didn't like DA2, I don't care for referencing Metacritic for any sort of useful data, especially reader reviews. It's pretty well-known that people with too much time on their hands (particularly unsavory portions of the Internet) love to organize downvoting brigades on sites like that, and this is especially magnified with games with any kind of controversial content. The hateboners especially show themselves with games coming from studios who have expressed certain left-leaning views like Bioware (left leaning in the modern day meaning "gay people exist").
Simple example? Take a game like Gone Home. At worst it's a completely pedestrian adventure game not that different from To The Moon or Hotel Dusk. I'll give you one guess as to which of these is the only one which has said discrepancy between professional and reader reviews.
On the other hand take a game like Hatred, a barely mediocre twin-stick shooter with ridiculous violence painted on top so they could get some controversy sales by acting they were totally sticking it to the SJWs or whatever. It was rightfully panned by critics for its subpar gameplay, and to be fair the same thing also largely happened with reader reviews on Metacritic...but still you don't see said discrepancy between the "professional" reviews and the reader reviews.
The only thing a bad user review score tells you is that the game stepped on some toes (and given how selective these discrepancies seem to happen, they also have to be the "right" toes- probably in more ways than one).
Simple example? Take a game like Gone Home. At worst it's a completely pedestrian adventure game not that different from To The Moon or Hotel Dusk. I'll give you one guess as to which of these is the only one which has said discrepancy between professional and reader reviews.
On the other hand take a game like Hatred, a barely mediocre twin-stick shooter with ridiculous violence painted on top so they could get some controversy sales by acting they were totally sticking it to the SJWs or whatever. It was rightfully panned by critics for its subpar gameplay, and to be fair the same thing also largely happened with reader reviews on Metacritic...but still you don't see said discrepancy between the "professional" reviews and the reader reviews.
The only thing a bad user review score tells you is that the game stepped on some toes (and given how selective these discrepancies seem to happen, they also have to be the "right" toes- probably in more ways than one).
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
Nah, just letting him know that all his suffering is paying off in the form of at least one dedicated viewer. Though I will admit that sometimes his hatred for a property can make the review even more entertaining. Kannazuki no Miko springs to mind...Madner Kami wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:00 am
So you're into torture-porn? Brave of you to admit that here.
Regarding the newest episode...even though it wasn't brought up, this part really drove home for me how much the game is on rails. Not only does it look like you have to help out both Meredith and Orsino, but it seems like each encounter can only end in a fight and/or people dying (with the exception of the Orlesian guy). In Dragon Age: Origins, you at least had a chance to persuade or intimidate people into backing down and thus avoiding bloodshed. Maybe that is an option and SFDebris' Hawke doesn't have a high enough charisma score (to mix my naming terms slightly), but based on everything he's been saying in the past reviews, I have my doubts.
-
- Officer
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:15 pm
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
How long was it before Black Panther got less then a perfect score from critics? let's not kid ourselves, professional critics do the same shit, and they don't even need a Reddit thread to plan their oh-so-samey reviews. Truth of the matter is that the only people that review shit on the internet are either getting paid to do so or have some sort of emotional investment in the product.MixedDrops wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:43 pm Even as someone who really didn't like DA2, I don't care for referencing Metacritic for any sort of useful data, especially reader reviews. It's pretty well-known that people with too much time on their hands (particularly unsavory portions of the Internet) love to organize downvoting brigades on sites like that, and this is especially magnified with games with any kind of controversial content. The hateboners especially show themselves with games coming from studios who have expressed certain left-leaning views like Bioware (left leaning in the modern day meaning "gay people exist").
Simple example? Take a game like Gone Home. At worst it's a completely pedestrian adventure game not that different from To The Moon or Hotel Dusk. I'll give you one guess as to which of these is the only one which has said discrepancy between professional and reader reviews.
On the other hand take a game like Hatred, a barely mediocre twin-stick shooter with ridiculous violence painted on top so they could get some controversy sales by acting they were totally sticking it to the SJWs or whatever. It was rightfully panned by critics for its subpar gameplay, and to be fair the same thing also largely happened with reader reviews on Metacritic...but still you don't see said discrepancy between the "professional" reviews and the reader reviews.
The only thing a bad user review score tells you is that the game stepped on some toes (and given how selective these discrepancies seem to happen, they also have to be the "right" toes- probably in more ways than one).
How often do you for example write an Amazon review for a product that worked exactly as advertised? because most people do so ... oh, never. The only people that write reviews on sites like IMDB, Metacritic, Steam, GoG, RottenTomatoes are "professional" critics that get paid to do so and people that have a lot of free time and have a positive or negative emotional investment caused by their exposure to the product being discussed - i.e., people that really really liked, or hated the product* being discussed.
* - product used deliberately to remind you all that someone is making money from whatever game, movie, tv show, novel etc. we're discussing. Indifferent of what the politics of a modern "work of art" are, at the end of the day it's still something that's being sold to you.
If Chuck or a mod reads this feel free do delete my account. I would do it myself but I don't seem to be able to find a delete account option. phpBB should have such an option but I guess this isn't stock phpBB.
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6484
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
Okay, what is it with Bioware and People Hiding In Wardrobes?
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
- hammerofglass
- Captain
- Posts: 2865
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
- Location: Corning, NY
Re: Dragon Age II: EA boogaloo
I fully understand and agree with Chuck's insistence that Da2, SWTOR, and ME 3 are on rails. Not to the extent of MEA where the story didn't branch in any way ever, but rails nonetheless.
I remain somewhat confused at his repeated assertions that DaO, KOTOR, and ME1&2 were not.
I remain somewhat confused at his repeated assertions that DaO, KOTOR, and ME1&2 were not.
One can only match, move by move, the machinations of fate... and thus defy the tyrannous stars.