Riedquat wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 6:55 pm
Angleterre for the whole of the UK? That annoys me a bit (and would probably do a lot more if I wasn't English!) Unlike some of the others it's just plain incorrect, as is using Holland to refer to the whole of The Netherlands.
Incorrect in exactness, but correct in reflecting the predominant hierarchical position each partner has had within their particular union, which in the case of England remains - the rest of the Union is subsidized by England. This is the cause of much resentment and frustration among the English given that they support everyone else without holding a position reflecting that fact. This is worsen by Devolution where the others posses degrees of autonomy that are not given to England, as England is generically looked upon as simply "British" by the Establishment in contrast to the catering done to everyone else's nationalism, since if the center of the Union fails to hold to "Britishishness" it'll be the final nail in the coffin for the Union.
England and Holland have always held that dominant position, even in the case of England being the "junior" partner "under" the personal union of a Scottish monarch like the Stewart's before Union (or the Duke's of Normandy after the Conquest even though they and the Angevins continued to reside in France by preferance for over a century).
It is for much the same reason that countries have exonyms which they derived from those sub-groups they'd interacted with the most. In the case of France, Germany is Allemange, reflecting which Germans historically shared a border the most with the Franks, that being the Aiemanni. Others, like the Estonians, refer to Germany as Saksamaa - land of the Saxons given the predominant position the Saxons played in the Ostsiedlung similar to the Irish nickname for the English, Sassenach, despite the origins of the nickname coming from the invasion of Ireland by Normans in the 11th Century which weren't Anglo-Saxons at all, but were looked on as synonymous to them by the Irish.
Another is Russia being synonymous with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, people of the Union being called Russians in the West and not Soviets. It's a source of great annoyance to a few pedantic Cold Warriors I know who will not hesitate to correct anyone who does that.
That doesn't match the anger they get from seeing people saying things like "the atomic bomb detonated" which sets them off correcting that nuclear weapons "initiate" a chain reaction. "Detonate" or "explosion" imply a chemical reaction, something which nuclear weapons do not have beyond their primer.