Star Trek Into Darkness Review

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
User avatar
hammerofglass
Captain
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
Location: Corning, NY

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Review

Post by hammerofglass »

The Uhura-Spock relationship is there to reassure certain viewers that the Spock-Kirk bromance is platonic. That's it. That's Uhura's whole character.
...for space is wide, and good friends are too few.
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Review

Post by Admiral X »

I thought it was to try to appeal to the date crowd.
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
User avatar
Mecha82
Captain
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:42 am
Location: Finland

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Review

Post by Mecha82 »

While generally I enjoy Into Darkness I do admit that they could had used Uhura better and that her relationship with Spock did feel forced. More so than in 09. I mean I would had loved to see her have bigger role and be more of her own character but alas sadly that wasn't meant to be. Now since I haven't seen Beyond I don't know did they actually improve those things in it when it comes to Uhura or did they keep that same or make it worse.
"In the embrace of the great Nurgle, I am no longer afraid, for with His pestilential favour I have become that which I once most feared: Death.."
- Kulvain Hestarius of the Death Guard
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11517
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Review

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

While I'm comfortable with the idea that Starfleet substantiates aspects of a military, it is interesting to speculate the non-military conception and see where Starfleet starts to stretch it.
Power laces... alright.
User avatar
Beelzquill
Officer
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:55 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Review

Post by Beelzquill »

Mecha82 wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:18 pm While generally I enjoy Into Darkness I do admit that they could had used Uhura better and that her relationship with Spock did feel forced. More so than in 09. I mean I would had loved to see her have bigger role and be more of her own character but alas sadly that wasn't meant to be. Now since I haven't seen Beyond I don't know did they actually improve those things in it when it comes to Uhura or did they keep that same or make it worse.
It's been a little while since I've seen Beyond, but I remember her being way better in it. Actually Beyond is much better with its female characters in general. If only they hadn't done a derp and make Sulu gay because George Takei is gay. I would have gone with Chekov.
User avatar
Beastro
Captain
Posts: 1150
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:14 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Review

Post by Beastro »

Admiral X wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 5:50 am I like Urban as an actor, but I never took to him as Bones. This isn't his fault, but the writers'.
I enjoy him in these movies, but he always came off as the only one in them that was doing more of an impression of their TOS character than genuinely trying to get into the role.
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4700
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Review

Post by CharlesPhipps »

Beastro wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2019 3:09 am
Admiral X wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 5:50 am I like Urban as an actor, but I never took to him as Bones. This isn't his fault, but the writers'.
I enjoy him in these movies, but he always came off as the only one in them that was doing more of an impression of their TOS character than genuinely trying to get into the role.
Totally the reverse. I think he channeled his character much better than everyone else.
Post Reply