VOY - Gravity

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
User avatar
TGLS
Captain
Posts: 2931
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: VOY - Gravity

Post by TGLS »

pilight wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:25 pm There are many sites illustrating how ridiculous the scientific aspects of CSI are.
It's not as if TNG's "multi-phasic temporal convergence in the space-time continuum." or TOS's "That might be done by generating a strong pinpoint charge of M-rays on some of these selected wave lengths and tying them in with the combined output of all our engines." is any better.
Image
"I know what you’re thinking now. You’re thinking 'Oh my god, that’s treating other people with respect gone mad!'"
When I am writing in this font, I am writing in my moderator voice.
Spam-desu
User avatar
Riedquat
Captain
Posts: 1905
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 12:02 am

Re: VOY - Gravity

Post by Riedquat »

TGLS wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:19 pm
pilight wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:25 pm There are many sites illustrating how ridiculous the scientific aspects of CSI are.
It's not as if TNG's "multi-phasic temporal convergence in the space-time continuum." or TOS's "That might be done by generating a strong pinpoint charge of M-rays on some of these selected wave lengths and tying them in with the combined output of all our engines." is any better.
Not seen CSI but is it actually trying to give the impression that there's any real-world science there? Obviously Trek isn't (with one or two rare exceptions).
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3906
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: VOY - Gravity

Post by McAvoy »

Riedquat wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:09 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:19 pm
pilight wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:25 pm There are many sites illustrating how ridiculous the scientific aspects of CSI are.
It's not as if TNG's "multi-phasic temporal convergence in the space-time continuum." or TOS's "That might be done by generating a strong pinpoint charge of M-rays on some of these selected wave lengths and tying them in with the combined output of all our engines." is any better.
Not seen CSI but is it actually trying to give the impression that there's any real-world science there? Obviously Trek isn't (with one or two rare exceptions).
It's been a long time since I have seen a CSI episode or any of those types of shows to begin with.

But I do remember that portrayal of investigating evidence takes much longer than it shows on the episode. Doesn't take hours or even days but weeks in some cases. Or how detailed the technology can be for investigating crimes.

Classic example is being able to zoom in and sharpen some shit security camera. Doesn't work that way. I am sure a fan of these shows could bring in better examples.

I am sure they don't pull the Trek standard of techno babble. Making up bullshit on the fly. I might be wrong though.
I got nothing to say here.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5676
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: VOY - Gravity

Post by clearspira »

TGLS wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:19 pm
pilight wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:25 pm There are many sites illustrating how ridiculous the scientific aspects of CSI are.
It's not as if TNG's "multi-phasic temporal convergence in the space-time continuum." or TOS's "That might be done by generating a strong pinpoint charge of M-rays on some of these selected wave lengths and tying them in with the combined output of all our engines." is any better.
Indeed. That is where the ''new Star Trek is dumber than old Star Trek'' thing does hit a brick wall. Chuck even named a trope after it, the Voodoo Shark.
Post Reply