DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
User avatar
Fixer
Doctor's Assistant
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:27 am

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by Fixer »

Rocketboy1313 wrote: I get the impression that due to its pioneering days Starfleet invests a comical amount of leeway to its captains.
If Picard made a judgement call in a time and place I imagine most of Starfleet would feel the need to trust his immediate and proximate assessment of a particular situation.
Then when something down the line happens that makes them regret it they give a, "look what you did" speech and decide to not let him participate in the defense of Earth when the Borg attack again like in "First Contact". Though he did anyway and it was for the best.
My belief is that that the Starfleet Admiralty exists explicitly to give misguided, misinformed or downright incompetent orders so that Starship Captains can look more heroic for disobeying them.

Kirk started out his Admiral's career well by nearly getting everyone on the Enterprise killed by an asteroid in a wormhole and having Deckard override his order but failed monumentally by saving the Earth against the whale probe. They busted his ass right back down to Captain for that.


Of course, Starfleet command looking the other way when people disobey the chain of command, the prime directive, or some commit questionable deeds when they work out okay in the end is probably why Section 31 managed to operate for over a century without any real problems.
Thread ends here. Cut along dotted line.
------8<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
CareerKnight
Officer
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:49 pm

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by CareerKnight »

cdrood wrote:I'm surprised no one mentioned the major flaw in this episode.

The whole plan is 100% reliant on Section 31 sending someone who knows the cure and that they still deem Bashir's recruitment valuable enough not to just kill him. Sloan appears to be fairly high ranking and at least does some recruitment. There's really know reason he'd know enough about the disease or the cure to be of any value.
This question is partially raised in the episode and Bashir states whoever the send would have to know the cure so they would know exactly what to look for with the possibility of them just blowing up his lab dismissed at too sloppy for Section 31. Sloan was probably going to evaluate if Bashir needed to be killed as well, hell his "mission" for Bashir might have been a suicide one.
cdrood wrote:From what we've seen there's little reason to assume they developed a cure at all. A cure would only be of value if they were looking to negotiate with the Founders. If wiping them out was the goal, then why waste effort on the cure?
"A bargaining chip should remain in play until the game is over, yes."
User avatar
Beastro
Captain
Posts: 1150
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:14 am

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by Beastro »

FakeGeekGirl wrote:It is incredibly easy to make that case with the benefit of hindsight.
In the end that is one major weaknesses of DS9 building the Dominion War that comes from the nature of how the show was built, as oppose to something like B5. So much of it is pure mechanical writing to steer things in that direction.
It ended the war, but only by incredible luck.
See above. All the more given that Section 31 acts in a way that belies it's "invention" during writing for the Dominion War without having see how it would work beforehand.
had that not happened, Sanders would have died and, based on what she herself said, let her last order be to the Jem'Hadar to fight to the last man while continuing to massacre Cardassians, costing countless more Cardassian, Federation, Klingon, Romulan, Breen and Dominion lives and made the Alpha Quadrant's victory very Pyrrhic.
You post ignores the over hanging thing regardless of the outcome in the AQ, that was how the Dominion would continue to handle things in what would become a long war that would against reignite when contact was reestablished with the AQ either through new tech making the distance travellable or a new wormhole being discovered. As soon as that happens the full brunt of the Dominion would be placed against the AQ in a way the Prophets couldn't prevent, and one whose only defence the AQ would have would be weapons and very, very massive destruction.

That is what factors in my thinking about the virus. It wasn't a guarantee, but killing off the Founders would be a good way to destabilize the Dominion when the AQ powers had very limited means to counter them, hence the Tal Shiar/Obsidian Order attack that was effectively a targeted assassination. AT the very least there were options at hand besides facing off against an invasion no one expected to defeat until the Prophets pulled a literal deus ex machina.

That is ultimately why I love DS9 and the Dominion War as a whole in that it provided the Fed and the AQ with an adversary that was another typical nation state, one far more powerful than any AQ nation and one that would require a compromising on principle in order to just survive. The Borg did that too, but remained a very remote foe that the writers could put off moving full force into the AQ indefinitely, while they were such a massive power that the only outcome would involve technobabble to get the writers out of such a corner.
We also already knew as an audience that there were other Changeling infants out there, so I'm assuming Odo had put that in a report somewhere along the way - presumably the Vorta knew too and I can see them keeping the machinery going (which they were more than likely capable of judging by the aforementioned centuries in which no one had seen goo nor puddle of a Changeling) while they wait for the return of the Changeling infants.
Or the AQ powers go hunting for their own and the long war becomes who can refound the Founders to manipulate the Dominion.

With that in mind it would have closed off options by knocking off Odo, but again, there were very few options the Fed and AQ had on the table. Even post-Dominion War, the only real hope of ending the threat of the Dominion revolves around either developing weapons to keep the deterrent effect going or try to rehabilitate the Founders by trying to move things on a more positive note, but after what's happened on both sides, I could see only the Federation being the ones who'd want to mend fences with the rest of the AQ hating the thought (especially the Romulans after the Star Trek reboot resulted in the destruction of Romulus) and the Founders having their entire racial prejudice being opposed by whatever effect Odo could have on them.

That is why I said the virus gave them time, even if the outcome was purely orchestrated by the writers, but you can at least say in some sense it's the best of the Federations ideals that led to a cure finding a balance between something that has been protecting the naive Federation from destruction through a more Realist outlook.

If anything is a massive strike against Section 31, it's that it being so secret was view as something necessary to get it into the Federation, as oppose to it being an open and moderating force against the blind idealism of the rest of the Federation government, something IMO, Star Fleet should have been being both the military as well as the force on the edge of the Known that can inform the nation about the threats abroad.
Granted once the war started you can argue that's hardly going to make the situation worse, but they infected Odo before the war turned hot . So they were clearly hoping to kill the Founders before war ever started, fair enough, but at risk of massive civilian casualties.

And they knew that the Founders were infiltrating all the other powers, therefore in a very good position to uncover a massive conspiracy that took dozens of people to carry out, perhaps even before you infect them all. In fact, I'm kind of amazed the Dominion didn't figure out where the virus came from but there goes that hindsight again. So that long suicide revenge rampage might not be so random if the Dominion knows who killed their gods.
I can full see why they did that before things went hot with the chaos that happened due to panic over possible Founder infiltration of the Federation government.

One thing the Founders paranoia about solid fear of them and what they're capable of doing that always fell flat was the very real possible things they could do that were made far far worse given their mentality and desire to only tolerate solids when their jackboot was on our throats. So much of Star Trek has been the Federation holding most of, if not all of, the cards and choosing to tolerate the crap of others beneath them out of principle. That was flipped on its head with the Dominion War when the Founders held all of the cards and expected us to trust them when everything they've done has only justified our distrust of them, something that ironically, Odo never raised in the AQ when there was ample room for it.

What was the first reaction to Odo? Treat him as a scientific curiosity, then as a neutral security guard under one of the most paranoid regimes in all of the Alpha Quadrant, not as a threat. The funny thing is the Founders odd "sending their offspring out into the galaxy", was the best means of befriending Solids, if only by introducing Changlings to them one by one at their mercy as infants, not as this massive superpower infamous for their ruthless, relentless expansion and eager use of terror.

I think there might be an unspoken element to the Founders "Solids hate and fear us", and it's that the Dominion would roll up next to nations and immediately treat the minor solid nation as an existential threat that would excuse their actions for overrunning them, with the Founder persecution being overplayed in their own minds in order to justify it.

Regardless, the Founders mentality was a self-fulfilling prophecy that only through extreme circumstances did the AQ survive, and its fear of the Founders was something that wasn't a mistake on any of their parts.

It reminds me of the whole problem with Iraq that resulted in last decades invasion. The way Saddam had played things, it left everyone thinking he had WMDs only he and a few knew Iraq didn't have, all the while he'd gotten so used to poking and pissing the US off that he suddenly found himself with his finger up America's bum right as someone else had proverbially punched the US in the face. I knew watching those towers go down that it didn't matter who was behind it, Saddam had pissed America off so much that with them now wanting to clean out in a rage, there was nothing Saddam could do to worm out of catching hell for how he'd interacted with the US.
It seems to me, and maybe I'm an idiot, like a huge gamble to assume the species that can look like anyone isn't going to uncover your plan to poison them, and that they'll die before the cold war turns hot without every figuring out that they were victims of a bioweapon made by the Federation, and that the Vorta who have been running things for centuries will just be unable to or unwilling to carry on without them, and that even if the Vorta give up the Jem'Hadar are going to just politely kill themselves quietly instead of going on a bloody psychotic rampage possibly through your quadrant until they die of white withdrawal.
To me a huge gamble with few alternatives many relying on variations of giving peace a chance.

Keep in mind no one knew of the deus ex machina that was the ultimate thing that saved the AQs ass when the Prophets closed the wormhole. All of their considerations had to work around that not being a consideration, especially given that it only happened because Sisko rolled in begging the Prophets, and even they it was something they really didn't want to do.
Not saying I'm in favor of genocide on the Founders but you could make a decent argument that it may have paradoxically strengthened Odo's case in the end. Sure solids attempting genocide fits right in with their view of the rest of the galaxy but two solids, after the Dominion had killed at least tens of thousands of their fellow citizens which likely included people they knew, being willing to risk their lives to save a Changeling just because they were friends and its the right thing to do... that's something that would be hard for them to rationalize away to fit their group think on solids.
ScreamingDoom wrote:I've always kind of wondered what the Dominion would do about a threat like the Borg. It seems to me, that the Borg would be the true ultimate threat for the Dominion. The Borg don't really have anything that can be infiltrated the way the Founders like to; they're a collective, so every Borg will immediately realize that one Borg is suspiciously outside its proper adjunct. There's also very little about the Borg that is secret. They plainly state their intentions, let folks wander around their ships until they make a nuisance of themselves, and are about as blatant as it is possible to be, so infiltrating a Borg cube wouldn't really gain much intelligence wise.

On the assimilation front, the Founders might be able to resist Borg nanoprobes (at least for a while) due to their unique biology, but it seems unlikely that Vorta or Jem'Hadar would, even with Founder genetic engineering. It seems to me that the Borg would quickly be able to engineer a White substitute that is continuously made by specialized cybernetics and pumped into Jem'Hadar that are assimilated. Ramming into Borg ships would not be a particularly effective tactic, either, as Borg cubes regenerate quick and would quickly adapt to such tactics by building more tractor beams or better shields to hold them at bay. Really, the Borg only seem to have lost in two specific instances: when they sent a cube to assimilate Earth, and with Species 8472. In the first case, they underestimated the forces needed to secure Earth (twice!) as well as the ingenuity of Federation technobabblers and in the second, they were encountering aliens literally from a different reality.

If the Federation had lost the war, it'd probably only be a few centuries at most before the Borg arrived back in the Alpha Quandrant and quickly crushed the Dominion there... then went through the wormhole to take down the Dominion in their home area.

That is why I'd love to see a post-Dominion War ST series set decades afterwards. See how the Dominion handles things now that the AQ isn't pressed into a war and how the AQ handles it. All the more, it would be interesting to see that lead to the Dominion admitting that they've faced an enemy back in the GQ that they don't think they can handled. In that case it would be neat to see that enemy be the Borg.

What would the AQ do? They could sit back and give the Dominion the finger or they could realize that if the Dominion falls half the galaxy would effectively be under Borg control and that it would be in their interests to not only aid the Dominion in fighting the Borg, but that it may very well be the most effective way of helping convince the Dominion that the AQ isn't a threat as aid turns into expeditionary units being sent into the GQ to help or even the AQ considering opening second front in the AQ itself against their rough borders with the Borg when it hits them that regardless of anything else, the Borg are everyone's primary ultimate enemy in the Milky Way.
Fixer wrote:Another theory that comes to mind is Section 31's own self preservation above that of the Federation.

Both the Changelings and section 31 are clandestine in their operations. S31 would have seen the threat more clearly than most, and the prospect of a perfect infiltrator such as a changeling replacing one of their agents thereby gaining access to their resources would have been terrifying. Unlike the Romulan and Cardassian intelligence services, they were unsanctioned and unaccountable. The Federation themselves would have them convicted if knowledge of their actions was made public. If they were turned against the Federation themselves they know exactly how much damage they could do.

The response to immediately destroy this threat later rationalised as ta defence of the Federation could really be S31's justification for an incredibly immoral act of in the name of protecting their own organisation.
That's where Section 31 has to be fit into the rest of Federation history. They have had many opportunities and many threats to justify overthrowing the Federation government, and they never have. Not even with the Dominion coming to steam roll through the wormhole did they think "Ok, it's time to take things over from these naive hippies and run things like they should to keep billions from dying.".

I think the only explanation is that, as unsettling as it is, Section 31 knows how terrible they are, but are so committed to the ideals of the Federation that they have kept themselves in check with their own naive idealism, and done so through a very rigorous selection process that we say resulted in Bashir being picked for recruitment instead of someone with a more of a lean towards ruthless realism like Sisko, a man that conspired with forces outside of his country to assassinate a foreign diplomat in order to drag their country into the war they were fighting.

Another thing I'd like to see in a post-Dominion War series would be how the Federation would handle the reveal of Section 31, especially given their actions in the war where the Fed is split between those who want their heads and those who want to give them medals and to legitimize them as a valuable and necessary part of the Federations defences.

I don't know if I mentioned it before, but I could see that causing a civil war and the Federation needs to be taken down a peg or two. If not all we're going to see will be more Dominions and Borg, no middling powers since they're no longer real threats. Having a Star Trek series centered in a time period when the Federation is undergoing a period of decline and internal division where it's people's have to reevaluate and adapt their ideals would help counter balance the essentially unrelenting march towards hegemony that it's gone through from TOS to Voyager, facing enemies, but always overcoming them and coming out all the stronger and all the more the dominant power in the Alpha Quadrant.

I'd very much like to see a break away nation that is an adversary, one that isn't yet another Imperial power but another republic with much the same outlook, one that has essentially kept the same fundamental ideals of the Federation despite the bad blood between them, just choosing to be more rough around the edges with them in the same way America is a knock off of the United Kingdom despite all the talk Americans like to go on about to the contrary.
Fixer wrote:
Rocketboy1313 wrote: I get the impression that due to its pioneering days Starfleet invests a comical amount of leeway to its captains.
If Picard made a judgement call in a time and place I imagine most of Starfleet would feel the need to trust his immediate and proximate assessment of a particular situation.
Then when something down the line happens that makes them regret it they give a, "look what you did" speech and decide to not let him participate in the defense of Earth when the Borg attack again like in "First Contact". Though he did anyway and it was for the best.
My belief is that that the Starfleet Admiralty exists explicitly to give misguided, misinformed or downright incompetent orders so that Starship Captains can look more heroic for disobeying them.

Kirk started out his Admiral's career well by nearly getting everyone on the Enterprise killed by an asteroid in a wormhole and having Deckard override his order but failed monumentally by saving the Earth against the whale probe. They busted his ass right back down to Captain for that.


Of course, Starfleet command looking the other way when people disobey the chain of command, the prime directive, or some commit questionable deeds when they work out okay in the end is probably why Section 31 managed to operate for over a century without any real problems.
A problem with that is the usual explanation for that in real life is distance and the inability to communicate resulting in on site actions that resulted in things like the Royal Navy running itself very much along lines more akin to a company than a military branch (Gaining a commission in the Army resulted in the typical mention of being accountable to the Monarch and to act honourable above all else, etc, etc. In the Navy the article given to a new officer told someone straight out their balls were in the Navy Boards hands and to not fail in acting in the interests of their nation or it would be the Board that would be the ones cutting their bits off). Up until wireless captains actions were largely predicated upon their success with effort coming second. Actions that undermined that zeal they sought to foster were remorselessly attacked, like Byng's execution for timidity and the lesson the generation that would later go on to fight the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars was to fight no matter what, don't rely on orders from back home because they'll come too late and be out of date when they do arrive.

Other powers operated with that mentality and fostered a mentality that obeying orders was more important than success, that being heroically defeated was better than acting on your own initiative that resulted in the Royal Navy running circles around their enemies as their spontaneous actions were rarely reacted to with such spontaneity.

That fits in very much with Star Treks original inspiration that comes from the Age of Sail.

I'll also add that TOS also touched on this, much to my surprise. After growing up with so much TNG, recently watching a TOS episode I'd never seen, The Galileo Seven, came as a surprise when Spock orders tolerance and restraint against space savages against the opinion of all the humans that push to react with deadly force, that plays a part in the death of one of the seven as Spock reacts shocked that giant cavemen would react so illogically.

Too much I've seen things presented where Spock's actions would have been justified in the end through simple writers fiat, it was really nice to see where his rhetoric about "respecting all life and not just our own" when faced with such a threat was shown to be as naive and foolish as it would be in such circumstances.

I really look forward to Chuck's recap of that episode.
Rocketboy1313 wrote:It is like the Borg, they are going to take over everything and must be stopped. Cure when you can, destroy when you must.
The Changelings needed to be destroyed. You can disagree but ultimately, without the disease, the war would have kept going and billions more would have died. Without the disease it is likely the Dominion would have won because they would have had even more resources to throw into the conflict.
That is the issue I hold with Picard and his handling of Hugh and the plan of sending a virus into the Borg. He outright refused to consider it and effectively placed Hugh's life above the threat the Borg are.

Yes the plan had very little chance of success, but trying it sacrificing the life of on drone was worth it, as was Odo's in far less ideal circumstances. It would have been interesting for TNG to have had a follow up episode after Wolf 359 where Picard finds himself in a similar situation and is less certain about the idealistic option.
MaxWylde
Officer
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu May 11, 2017 2:25 am

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by MaxWylde »

One of my little niggles in this episode is...why didn't they just interface Sloan's mind with the Holosuite? Probably might've prevented them from dying in Sloan's brain if he died, and I don't think this is far beyond the range of Star Trek Techno-Magic.

As for there being no civil oversight, that, to me, isn't the issue. Because there is likely some sort of oversight; institutions are products of a people and its culture, and Section 31 is not the product of a top-down approach, but rather something that generated within the people who created the Federation, and the cultures they already resided in.

Consider some salient facts here: The Federation thinks of itself as noble and good as the wind-driven snow in every conceivable way. America thinks likewise; we tend to use our mythos about ourselves less than something that points to the truth of who we are as a people and more as a screen to shield ourselves from the uglier stuff, like the Trail of Tears, the Know-Nothing Riots, Shay's Rebellion, Whiskey Rebellion, Slavery, Dred Scott, Fugitive Slave Act, Andersonville, the Burning of Atlanta and the March to the Sea, Wounded Knee, Reconstruction, Jim Crow, and on and on and on. And we are a very self-affirming country; during the 2016 Presidential Campaign, one thing both Hillary and Trump agreed on is America is great because we're good. This has lent itself to a rather peculiar and, dare I say (and this is coming from a former soldier) arrogant attitude: If you gave something good to us, we deserved it, and if we took something from you, you deserved it. Gratitude is not a big American trait, and neither is it in the Federation.

What's the point? The point is that if you think you're so great, and so wonderful, and so awesome, you're going to create the instruments to protect that self-image. The Self-Affirming thing I talked about is one. An organization like Section 31 is another; you have this organization so secret, and thus no accountability (well, little) so that if they are caught in the act of doing something nasty, the Federation itself can disavow it, and will be glad to throw the people involved completely under the bus to protect the self-image.

It would be one thing if the Federation were a bit more honest with itself; that maybe they're not all that and a bag of chips, and that they are not so wonderful and that their society is not so great. At the least, such an organization would not be disavowed because the government and society at large wouldn't have so much of a problem with it, because sometimes horrible things have to be done to protect your nation. Such an organization would also be less prone to atrocity; not that they wouldn't do it - it depends on what the society thinks about itself. If the society were bottom-up/top-down fascist, such as Nazi Germany, the Gestapo and the Abwehr are natural byproducts. If it were less so, and more, shall we say, more like Spain after the Reconquista, you'd have very humane systems at work here (The Spanish Inquisition, for instance, was not at all horrible; did you know that the Spanish Inquisition handed more people over to the secular authority for punishment for bestiality than they did for heresy? And after 350 years, about 4,000 people were burned - about 11 people a year nationwide - compare that to the American Legal System).

There's a difference between saying you are great and wonderful and actually being great and wonderful. If you're not, you'll do anything to protect the image you've created for yourself, and what's more you might even go after anyone who's actually better than you, because they are a real reminder of what you're not.
User avatar
FaxModem1
Captain
Posts: 839
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:18 am

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by FaxModem1 »

They have Starfleet Intelligence for that, remember the O'Brien episodes where he worked for them to infiltrate the Orion Syndicate to ensure that the Dominion didn't use them as a third party to drive a wedge between the UFP and the Klingons?

They don't need a rogue terrorist organization to do that stuff for them. They're loose cannons, and their decisions make short term benefits for long term problems. A Romulan operative loyal to you is only good for as long as he is in power, or you have leverage on him. Whereas someone who is used to working with the Federation might push for a better relationship with them, or for more internal reforms.

Though that's a moot point considering the entire Senate was killed in a Reman coup a few years later.

The Federation has flaws, but them trying to be above board in their intelligence practices is not one of them.
Image
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 4018
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by Madner Kami »

FaxModem1 wrote:They have Starfleet Intelligence for that, remember the O'Brien episodes where he worked for them to infiltrate the Orion Syndicate to ensure that the Dominion didn't use them as a third party to drive a wedge between the UFP and the Klingons?

They don't need a rogue terrorist organization to do that stuff for them. They're loose cannons, and their decisions make short term benefits for long term problems. A Romulan operative loyal to you is only good for as long as he is in power, or you have leverage on him. Whereas someone who is used to working with the Federation might push for a better relationship with them, or for more internal reforms.

Though that's a moot point considering the entire Senate was killed in a Reman coup a few years later.

The Federation has flaws, but them trying to be above board in their intelligence practices is not one of them.
I think the point is finer than what you read out of it. His point isn't that Section 31 is government-institution at all, but rather those who find out about it, cover it up because it's convinient to have such people and such an organization at hand. A "lie that we all agreed on" and convinced us of being true.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
User avatar
Rocketboy1313
Captain
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:17 pm

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by Rocketboy1313 »

Anybody else remembering Cerberus in "Mass Effect 2"?

Anyone else seeing some parallels?

They are not good guys, they are just on the side of the Federation.
My Blog: http://rocketboy1313.blogspot.com/
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Rocketboy1313
My Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/blog/rocketboy1313
My Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/13rocketboy13
MaxWylde
Officer
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu May 11, 2017 2:25 am

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by MaxWylde »

FaxModem1 wrote:They have Starfleet Intelligence for that, remember the O'Brien episodes where he worked for them to infiltrate the Orion Syndicate to ensure that the Dominion didn't use them as a third party to drive a wedge between the UFP and the Klingons?

They don't need a rogue terrorist organization to do that stuff for them. They're loose cannons, and their decisions make short term benefits for long term problems. A Romulan operative loyal to you is only good for as long as he is in power, or you have leverage on him. Whereas someone who is used to working with the Federation might push for a better relationship with them, or for more internal reforms.

Though that's a moot point considering the entire Senate was killed in a Reman coup a few years later.

The Federation has flaws, but them trying to be above board in their intelligence practices is not one of them.
The disadvantage with Starfleet Intelligence over Section 31 is that if SFI is ever caught doing clandestine stuff or something rather nasty, the Federation can't really disavow it, not even to their citizens, even if the government didn't order such activities. And what usually would happen, in order to preserve their self-image, is that Starfleet Intelligence would suffer for it; not that they wouldn't if the Federation were a little more honest with itself, because usually in such events various officers involved would lose their jobs or worse and SFI would lose funding and/or resources as they are raked over the coals publicly for it. At least with Section 31 they can say, with some plausible deniability (even under psychic interrogation) that they didn't know anything about it and completely disavow them. Section 31 operatives are probably sworn to such secrecy even to protect who they work for and on who's behalf they're working for even to their deaths, which Sloan was willing to do. This way, Section 31 can continue to work as they do without much interference, if at all, intact. Whatever funding or resources they get wouldn't change, because they don't officially exist, and whomever it was that got caught was not affiliated with the Federation or Starfleet or any of their operations.

Given the existence of psychic interrogations like Mind Melds and the abilities of full Betazoid telepaths, I'd say Section 31 is absolutely vital to Federation security. It's probably the smartest thing the Federation has ever done, and probably the last smart thing they would ever do. Not that I'm defending what Section 31 does, I'm saying that all nations have such operatives doing something, especially if they're trying to preserve something more than their mere security, such as their self-image.

Kind of makes me think about Tam Elbron. He was the Betazoid in TNG Tin Man; I'm sure Section 31 probably kept their distance from him all the while had their eyes on him in various ways. They probably had plans to kill him, if necessary, because a guy like that is a gigantic risk to Section 31. I'm sure they were happy to see him go off with an living spaceship. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if they had a hand in turning him into something of a disgrace following some sort of disaster he was involved in; maybe they didn't cause the disaster (or did they?) but a few words to the right people here and there could be enough to sully his reputation as a diplomat.

On that note, all intelligence organizations consider everything high and low for potential threats. So that brings up the likes of Q, the Doud, the Metrons, Trelane (I heard he was a Q), and other preternatural beings. It would be interesting to think of a story where they had to consider having to deal with the likes of them.
User avatar
Dînadan
Officer
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:14 pm

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by Dînadan »

MaxWylde wrote:
On that note, all intelligence organizations consider everything high and low for potential threats. So that brings up the likes of Q, the Doud, the Metrons, Trelane (I heard he was a Q), and other preternatural beings. It would be interesting to think of a story where they had to consider having to deal with the likes of them.
I don't think they'd stand a chance; it'd be like Batman having a plan to take out Cthulhu. As epic as that'd be, it'd break credulity; even going toe to toe with Superman is already a stretch (and that's only possible itself because Batman always carries Kryptonite; I can't imagine him being able to whip out an anti-Elder God spray from his utility belt).

Although...Cthulhu locked up in a cell in Arkham's basement would explain a hell of a lot; his presence driving everyone working and incarcerated there more and more insane (except the Joker of course, if anything touching minds with him would drive the eldrich abomination insane :lol: )
User avatar
FaxModem1
Captain
Posts: 839
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:18 am

Re: DS:9 "Extreme Measures"

Post by FaxModem1 »

MaxWylde wrote:The disadvantage with Starfleet Intelligence over Section 31 is that if SFI is ever caught doing clandestine stuff or something rather nasty, the Federation can't really disavow it, not even to their citizens, even if the government didn't order such activities. And what usually would happen, in order to preserve their self-image, is that Starfleet Intelligence would suffer for it; not that they wouldn't if the Federation were a little more honest with itself, because usually in such events various officers involved would lose their jobs or worse and SFI would lose funding and/or resources as they are raked over the coals publicly for it. At least with Section 31 they can say, with some plausible deniability (even under psychic interrogation) that they didn't know anything about it and completely disavow them. Section 31 operatives are probably sworn to such secrecy even to protect who they work for and on who's behalf they're working for even to their deaths, which Sloan was willing to do. This way, Section 31 can continue to work as they do without much interference, if at all, intact. Whatever funding or resources they get wouldn't change, because they don't officially exist, and whomever it was that got caught was not affiliated with the Federation or Starfleet or any of their operations.
And what happens when Section 31 takes an interest in, say, the elections of a member planet which has an isolationist faction that is gaining traction, or in a scientist's revolutionary work that would make it easier to detect a lot of their technologies, or a popular artist is making popular art that decries actions or policies done by the Federation? Are these people quietly taken out by Section 31?

Starfleet Intelligence, or their leadership above them, would say that this isn't necessary, as these are people exercising their constitutional rights, and expressing themselves within Federation law. Section 31, on the other hand, would say these people are an imminent threat and must be dealt with. Thereby depriving the Federation of discourse of ideas, revolutionary technologies, and freedom of expression. This ruins the very thing the Federation is supposed to have to make it a wonderful place.
Given the existence of psychic interrogations like Mind Melds and the abilities of full Betazoid telepaths, I'd say Section 31 is absolutely vital to Federation security. It's probably the smartest thing the Federation has ever done, and probably the last smart thing they would ever do. Not that I'm defending what Section 31 does, I'm saying that all nations have such operatives doing something, especially if they're trying to preserve something more than their mere security, such as their self-image.

Kind of makes me think about Tam Elbron. He was the Betazoid in TNG Tin Man; I'm sure Section 31 probably kept their distance from him all the while had their eyes on him in various ways. They probably had plans to kill him, if necessary, because a guy like that is a gigantic risk to Section 31. I'm sure they were happy to see him go off with an living spaceship. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if they had a hand in turning him into something of a disgrace following some sort of disaster he was involved in; maybe they didn't cause the disaster (or did they?) but a few words to the right people here and there could be enough to sully his reputation as a diplomat.
Except that we have seen that Mind Melds can be overthrown, as shown by Dukat in "The Maquis", and that trained operatives can get around such things. And as we saw in "Chain of Command", one doesn't even need psychics, as sufficient drugging of captives will get them to reveal all their secrets. It's more likely that such Starfleet Intelligence and Section 31 both have telepaths on their side, quietly gaining information while quietly going about their duty in areas. We saw how effective Troi was aboard a Romulan ship in "Face of the Enemy".

Comparing the way the Federation operates, in welcoming other races into the fold and integrating them into their culture, it's likely that this gives the Federation a natural advantage over people like the Romulans or Klingons, wherein natural psychics are serving on their ship, respecting other people's privacy, but acts as a natural defense against intelligence agents sneaking aboard, as we saw Ambassador Troi do to a couple of would-be bomber terrorists. The Klingons and Romulans, who conquer instead of integrating, have no such defense, and are more open to such kinds of infiltration.
On that note, all intelligence organizations consider everything high and low for potential threats. So that brings up the likes of Q, the Doud, the Metrons, Trelane (I heard he was a Q), and other preternatural beings. It would be interesting to think of a story where they had to consider having to deal with the likes of them.
It would probably go horribly, as 9 out of 10 times, it was noble qualities such as mercy, compassion, reason, etc. that allowed the higher powers to spare the Enterprise/the Federation/humanity. A ruthless group would be found wanting, and easily killed. In fairness, they might make such a deal with the Talosians, who needed breeding stock.

Even if Section 31 somehow protects the borders of the Federation, which is questionable due to the long term problems such an organization creates with its neighbors, it certainly kills the spirit of it.
Image
Post Reply