Speculation: SF Debris's view on "Silicon Avatar"

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Speculation: SF Debris's view on "Silicon Avatar"

Post by Yukaphile »

Fuck, I was thinking of "The Devil in the Dark!" Sorry...
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
CareerKnight
Officer
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:49 pm

Re: Speculation: SF Debris's view on "Silicon Avatar"

Post by CareerKnight »

Yukaphile wrote: Tue Oct 30, 2018 6:58 pm and it takes me back to Kirk's line from, what was it? "The Cloud?" On how he was obsessed with revenge. And he admitted maybe he was. McCoy countered revenge won't bring the dead back. Kirk conceded, but then added, "it might mean they rest easy." Another reason to highlight the ways Gene hurt, rather than helped, in the creation of Star Trek.
That was The Conscious of the King.
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Speculation: SF Debris's view on "Silicon Avatar"

Post by Yukaphile »

Oops... again, sorry. My apologies. HUGE BLUSH right now...
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
CareerKnight
Officer
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:49 pm

Re: Speculation: SF Debris's view on "Silicon Avatar"

Post by CareerKnight »

Yukaphile wrote: Wed Nov 07, 2018 4:19 am Oops... again, sorry. My apologies. HUGE BLUSH right now...
No apologies needed, not correcting you because you were wrong but to be helpful.
Post Reply