clearspira wrote: ↑Sun Aug 18, 2019 2:49 pm
If everyone had worked together to survive, they would have.
That seems very likely to me. An escape expert, a doctor, a maths student, an engineer, a cop, and a guy with even greater maths talent that needs nurturing. They have all the tools they need. I don't know what role the first guy would have had but its fair to say he would have had one - he gets taken out by a trap so probably not an inside man, my guess would be lawyer, politician or even a general, someone who perhaps could have been the group diplomat.
[/quote]
Only just got around to watching this review (at the time it came out I was only in the mood for something lighthearted, a possible nearby dam burst rather occupying my mind).
On this point I don't think it's fair to say they would all have survived working together - they'd first have to figure out there are deadly traps without getting caught in them, and work out the system without getting caught in more. Anyone is going to be very lucky to get that information without doing it the hard way.
The premise is interesting enough itself, and the ideas Chuck raised although it suffers from trying to give more than a tiny bit of thought to the bigger picture (and from what people are saying about the other films exploring that wasn't a good move). Maybe there couldn't have been the same film with better worldbuilding (i.e. the context it's in), and whilst that shouldn't necessarily be a complete barrier to a story it'll always suffer from it.
And "everyone dies" / "all die apart from one" films I generally find too depressing to want to watch.