McAvoy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 08, 2022 4:11 amIf you think about it, there were mentions of wars Starfleet fought before TNG and they all sounded like border skirmishes then actual wars. The Cardassian war may have been only one that may have actually tested them but I can easily see that as small scale.
To me, Starfleet was probably operating on a full time peacetime fleet. Like operating at half capacity with more of the less combat capable and more science oriented ships being crewed.
Yeah, I mean just look at the Galaxy-class. It's a flying hotel with enough space for the entire population of a small city and it carries civilians routinely, families of the crew-members. That's insane for anything that might end up in actual combat for a myriad of reasons. Personally, I feel this is down to writers just not understanding scale, but in-universe and hindsight... yeah. Starfleet was not a military, it was a luxury cruise company at that point.
As for the Cardassian War, I dunno if DS9 was actually going for that angle, but you can read quite some disturbing subtext there. The Cardassians fought a true war or thought they did and went full scale Russian on the Federation. And what does the Federation do? Essentially nothing. At best, they half-arsed it and left their troops out to dry, while they had absolute numerical, technological and logistical superiority. The Federation should have, by all accounts, moped the floor with the Cardassians and instead agreed to a disadvantageous peace-treaty which left sizeable parts of Federation citizens behind enemy lines and royally screwed over planets like Bajor. The terrible truth is: the Maquis was right. Starfleet, argueably the entire Federation, wasn't willing to fight for it's ideals or, worse, it's own people.
The show TNG or even Trek as a whole could've become, if it weren't for that damn self-contained episodic format, if you think about it... DS9 was so endlessly great, precisely because it steered away from self-contained story-telling and going for story-arches. Imagine that in TNG. Or Voyager. The famed Year of Hell, which should've been the entire series...
And, writing this while also writing in a military-forum, where we are currently discussing certain figures who advocate for peace in Ukraine. It looks all too familiar. Their reasoning being: War creates suffering and suffering is bad. So if Ukraine just surrenders, the war is over and there will be no suffering, no death. And yes, true. There wouldn't be any further death. But there would also be no Ukraine. No ukrainian people. And a cultural genocide would happen, argueably even a completed genocide. These "doves", that is the Federation during the Cardassian War. And what did their refusal to fight give them? Massacres like on Setlik III. The Bajoran occupation. Tens of thousands, if not houndreds of thousands of traumatized personell and citizens. Disloyal personell and, further down the line, just another, completely preventable war, which cost billions of lives and brought the Federation to near-collapse. Just like peace at all costs in Ukraine would destroy the Western World.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox