Re: Jurassic Park film
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2020 7:14 pm
In the natural order of things, dinosaurs pose a very intrusive piece. Saying that they had their shot, by Malcom, I take, is to mean that in the sense of first come first serve they were allowed first to shape the ordinance of the chaos framework, as they existed. Since they lost their parking space though, on the systematic level of things, their place has been taken and there isn't really room for them anymore. [further] It's not as if we caused it, being thus due to correct it, which would warrant intervening in nature. It happened, and it's not really something we should try to revert back to, on the grand scheme of things.
Given that it's just one uninhabited island though, I still think it's not very pertinent of a concern as the movie lets on.
Also, Ian's not the one that posits parently that being a man-made extinction is the ONLY warranted means of intervening. Hammond brought up condors, and Malcom shot that down with the presumed reasoning rather correctly in trying to affirm his overall flawed point.
Given that it's just one uninhabited island though, I still think it's not very pertinent of a concern as the movie lets on.
Also, Ian's not the one that posits parently that being a man-made extinction is the ONLY warranted means of intervening. Hammond brought up condors, and Malcom shot that down with the presumed reasoning rather correctly in trying to affirm his overall flawed point.