https://sfdebris.com/videos/bsg/bsg78_1.php
A review I have long waited for.
My only comment on the reviews itself? Themself? Why rescue one person, and why not show the refugees more. Extras cost lots of money. Basically why the borg always use one cube at a time. You can have two cubes or Data in makeup.
Okay not my only comment. Mostly because I thought of this while writing this. I feel sorry for the woman that had to play the robot dog. But I think the idea was to show robots are not in and of themselves the enemy. Sure the Cylons are bad, but not all machines even thinking ones are. Just my thought.
Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
The sheer improbability of mines capable of being ignited by blaster fire and destroying the planet is a leap too far, IMO. Coal deposits are one thing, they're geologically insignificant, and require access to surface air to burn, but a substance so easily activated that a future gun could set it off could never have been set down in the first place.
One of the many problems with treating planets as stand-ins for regions.
One of the many problems with treating planets as stand-ins for regions.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
Ahem. "We believe it was caused by over-mining and insufficient safety precautions."
Seriously the only planet detonator I find plausible is the Death Star. If only because of scale.
I don't think it is so much treating planets as regions. As writers have no sense of scale. And my favourite comment on that. And I am paraphrasing. George R. R. Martin saw the wall the designers made. He looked at it and said that is a damn big wall. They said they did it to the scale in his books. His reply was. "Then I made it too big!"
Seriously the only planet detonator I find plausible is the Death Star. If only because of scale.
I don't think it is so much treating planets as regions. As writers have no sense of scale. And my favourite comment on that. And I am paraphrasing. George R. R. Martin saw the wall the designers made. He looked at it and said that is a damn big wall. They said they did it to the scale in his books. His reply was. "Then I made it too big!"
- CharlesPhipps
- Captain
- Posts: 4956
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
I mean, for the Klingons and Praxis, it's a Dilithium mine. You know that nonsensical magical substance that allows reality to be altered so lightspeed can happen. They also use antimatter for everything in Star Trek. I don't have my suspension of disbelief broken too much that they blew up their moon. Because we're already dealing in nonsensium.
- Madner Kami
- Captain
- Posts: 4056
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
U-hu. Exactly what a thinking machine would say in order to convince us of this.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
We're all thinking machines. Some of us are made of meat.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
If memory serves, the moon of Praxis was being used as an energy production station, likely producing antimatter to be used as fuel.
In theory, we can do that now - not on a useful scale, but our technology allows it. Increasing the scale makes a horrendous disaster possible, yeah - loss of containment would cause a tremendous burst of gamma rays. Nothing about that is nonsensical.
In theory, we can do that now - not on a useful scale, but our technology allows it. Increasing the scale makes a horrendous disaster possible, yeah - loss of containment would cause a tremendous burst of gamma rays. Nothing about that is nonsensical.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
Wasn't it a tibenum mine? The stuff they used to power blasters and the FTL drives so it was similarly fantasy fuel?CharlesPhipps wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:30 am I mean, for the Klingons and Praxis, it's a Dilithium mine. You know that nonsensical magical substance that allows reality to be altered so lightspeed can happen. They also use antimatter for everything in Star Trek. I don't have my suspension of disbelief broken too much that they blew up their moon. Because we're already dealing in nonsensium.
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
I have not been a synth since the day I was buil, err born.Madner Kami wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 5:44 pmU-hu. Exactly what a thinking machine would say in order to convince us of this.
Re: Battlestar Galactica: Saga of a Star World
Poor Pinocchio. He hasn't been a synth since the day he was built and everyone assumes he's a liar.