Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4964
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by CharlesPhipps »

Winter wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 3:13 am
In all the time I've known you I don't think you've mentioned a single redemption arc you like. Why is that?
I think generally because I enjoy the consequentialist ones.

* Arthur Morgan
* John Marston
* Darth Vader himself

Generally, these require dire consequences and responses for the characters that go through them and I also like ones where the protagonists fail too.

It should be hard in my opinion.

Lando is a guy who survives his redemption but it requires him to lose his fortune, city, and position in order to make up for what he did to Han Solo. His crimes are also far less than Vader's.
User avatar
phantom000
Captain
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:32 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by phantom000 »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:41 am
Winter wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 3:13 am
In all the time I've known you I don't think you've mentioned a single redemption arc you like. Why is that?
I think generally because I enjoy the consequentialist ones.

* Arthur Morgan
* John Marston
* Darth Vader himself

Generally, these require dire consequences and responses for the characters that go through them and I also like ones where the protagonists fail too.

It should be hard in my opinion.

Lando is a guy who survives his redemption but it requires him to lose his fortune, city, and position in order to make up for what he did to Han Solo. His crimes are also far less than Vader's.
Speaking of which, I think Vader's redemption arch was handled kinda poorly because it feels like it happens out of no where. I mean they do explain why he ultimately turns on the emperor, but there is no real sign of him changing until the last possible second.

Lando, well, I never really thought of it as a redemption arch as Vader was supposed to be holding a proverbial gun to his head the entire time. I always imagined he was planning to turn on Vader from the start but he had to wait for the right moment otherwise Cloud City would have been destroyed.
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by Madner Kami »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:41 am
Winter wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 3:13 am
In all the time I've known you I don't think you've mentioned a single redemption arc you like. Why is that?
I think generally because I enjoy the consequentialist ones.

* Arthur Morgan
* John Marston
* Darth Vader himself

Generally, these require dire consequences and responses for the characters that go through them and I also like ones where the protagonists fail too.

It should be hard in my opinion.

Lando is a guy who survives his redemption but it requires him to lose his fortune, city, and position in order to make up for what he did to Han Solo. His crimes are also far less than Vader's.
I pretty much agree. Redemption stories have this wierd tendency to let mass murderers, genocidal maniacs and people on that level run off scot free. Letting a thief get back on "the good side" while getting a pass, sure, but people like Kylo Ren? Murdered his own father, murdered a bunch of Jedi padawans, massacring a village of force hippies, eradicating whatever group was hiding the %holocronthing% in Rise of Skywalker, assault and battering of subordinates, attempting to murder his own mother and on and on and on. You don't just "get better", after having done such things and there's a myriad of villains who just walk that off. It doesn't send a good message.

I mean, think of it that way: Himmler, at the end of the war, has a change of heart or at least says he does. He personally kills Hitler and demands to speak with Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt, who welcome him and grant him a seat in their circle.

Image
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11638
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:41 am
Winter wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 3:13 am
In all the time I've known you I don't think you've mentioned a single redemption arc you like. Why is that?
I think generally because I enjoy the consequentialist ones.

* Arthur Morgan
* John Marston
* Darth Vader himself

Generally, these require dire consequences and responses for the characters that go through them and I also like ones where the protagonists fail too.

It should be hard in my opinion.

Lando is a guy who survives his redemption but it requires him to lose his fortune, city, and position in order to make up for what he did to Han Solo. His crimes are also far less than Vader's.
This is interesting. So would you say that the more modernist aspects of character outcome are discreetly placed in redemption arc’s, and not just a broad encompassing of plot direction in politics?
..What mirror universe?
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4964
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by CharlesPhipps »

BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 3:59 pmThis is interesting. So would you say that the more modernist aspects of character outcome are discreetly placed in redemption arc’s, and not just a broad encompassing of plot direction in politics?
I admit I tend to take a more cynical and dark take on writing in my own writing and this is perhaps influencing what I like to enjoy in my stories but I also note that I feel like the redemptions shown in quite a few of the stories shown as examples are ones that exist regardless of character development. I also sometimes feel they're applied inconsistently and suffer a bit from "s/he's a protagonist and fan favorite so it works for them but not others."

It's REALLY noticeable in the sequels and She-Ra as well as Avatar.

Allow me to explain:

Star Wars

Kylo Ren is established as essentially an enormous shit bag who converted to the Dark Side of the Force because of his excessive Vader fanboyism. He murdered his fellow Jedi students, joined the First Order, and is involved in the destruction of Hosnian Prime. He's a scumbag who has no grand operatic reason for his evil (TLJ even says THE FORCE argued he's a monster and Luke turning on him was only a second's worry). However, he's redeemed out of a mother's love and Rey despite there being no reason whatsoever for him to have done the horrible things he did. It's an unsatisfying plot arc because it ignores that he had no reason to be a baddie until he wasn't except the assumption that Ben Solo was an evil shitbag to the core.

Contrast this to Finn who is a Stormtrooper who leaves the First Order and immediately starts blowing up his fellow child-soldiers. Finn is shown to be a human underneath that mask and immediately we have to wonder why all the others aren't slave soldiers either and worry about why Finn is so gleeful killing them or at least not grimly determined. His redemption is because he's a protagonist, not because we need to realize the Stormtroopers as a whole are indoctrinated brainwahsed slaves. Merct is extended to Finn but not the others because, well, we only have him as a main character.

There's an inconsistent ideology of good vs. evil that is lacking from the OT and even Prequels because at least there, "Fascists bad, Democracy Believing Rebels Good" is a consistent ethos. Indeed, the Prequels go out of their way to make it clear Anakin is a screwed up shitbag in general, perhaps excessively so, versus being corrupted by magic or other powers.

Avatar

Zuko is probably the best one here and I am willing to acknowledge he has all the makings of being a redeemable person. Indeed, as a child/teenager, he probably should be forgiven a lot. However, I actually also object to the fact that the show goes, "Well Zuko is good and kind but AZULA is evil." Azula who is irreedeemable because she's a psychopath and narcicisst but Zuko isn't despite her being a child too.

It tells us who is redeemable and not rather than give us a belief both should be redeemable or not.

The plot has decided for us.

She-Ra

Oddly, I think part of the issue that I have with Catra's redemption is that I grok Catra and like her a character a great deal. She-Ra is a woman who has always had a privileged view of the Horde due to being babyed by Shadow Weaver and convinced it was the good guys by propaganda. So it came as a great shock to her when it turned out they were imperialist conquerors and she turned on it.

However, Catra has ALWAYS known that the Horde was evil because they abused and tortured her. However, that "might makes right, survive at all costs" attitude is something that she also understands and internalizes because she's had to live it. She-Ra saying, "Oh my God, they're actually evil! Can you believe it!?" Ticks her off because it clearly shows She-ra was not paying attention to the abuse Catra was suffering and actually believed that poor Catra deserved all the punishments and abuses she got.

It'd piss me off too.

So I've been really enjoying her rise through the ranks motivated by the fact she knows that it's a dysfunctional awful mess and that only by getting to the top can she avoid being the ant stepped on. I also note the horrible things she does along the way that culminated in She-Ra finally turning her back on her--and one of the story's most powerful moments.
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by Winter »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:41 am Generally, these require dire consequences and responses for the characters that go through them and I also like ones where the protagonists fail too.

It should be hard in my opinion.
Well, it WAS hard for Catra. For her crimes Catra lost her empire, lost everyone she ever cared about, was tortured after her first true good deed and actually died (briefly) when the girl she loved came to save her. THEN she had to face the reality that she would have to spend the rest of her life working to make up for her redemption.

To cover the point you made of Catra's worst moment, activating the portal that would result in reality being destroyed and her blaming Adora for that, I agree that is Catra at her worst BUT there are a few things that need to be taken into account. First, within the span of a day Catra was Abondoned by her surrogate mother who used manipulated her by showing the affection she always wanted (while Catra was doing everything in her power to save her I might add) tortured to death by Hordak, exiled, learned that Shadow Weaver left her for Adora (which is true from a certain point of view) and was told that Adora is right about the portal.

Now, I'm NOT defending her actions here and seeing Adora knock Catra out was greatly satisfying and an important moment for Adora arc BUT the fact that this all happens within the span of 24 hours would be enough to drive anyone crazy and it's clearly that Catra does regret her choice.

The next thing to note is that Glimmer does something just as bad inn Season 4. At this point Glimmer wanted to destroy the Horde both because she saw them as a threat and to avenge her mother. On top of that her relationship with Adora has been falling apart since the S4 began which is not being helped by her taking Shadow Weaver's advice over Adora's (you know, the woman who emotionally manipulated and abused Adora since before she knew how to spell). Then Glimmer learns of the Heart of a Etheria which is a super weapon that will enhance her powers and allow her to destroy the Horde. But Adora makes it clear that this is a bad plan because the Heart will DESTROY Etheria if activated but Glimmer refuses to listen because Adora isn't telling her what she wants to hear.

In the end Glimmer basically puts Adora and Bow under house arrest for not agreeing with her and to insure that they can't stop her from activating the Heart of Etheria which she does eventually and learns that Adora was right and Etheria is going to be destroyed as a result. While she does try to stop it she DID cause this problem which leads to God knows how many innocent people dying and the only reason it isn't worse is because Catra told Horde Prime about the weapon which bought the Alliance the time they needed to come up with a plan to stop him.

Glimmer choice to activate the Heart is just as bad as Catra activating the portal. Both are warned of the dangers of doing so and both show guilt for their actions after words. Now, I will grant you that Catra's redemption took a while but, as someone who's dealt with people who were abusive I can assure that this is actually VERY realistic.

The mentality of abuse that is forced onto people from a young age isn't easily broken and for some it's never broken. I've know people who were absolutely horrible and did horrible things to people I consider friends. Some of them refused to get better and couldn't move on. And some did and are now good people who are doing their best.

Catra is the story of someone overcoming abuse and working to redeem themselves. To earn the love they want and to be better. As Stevenson said in their charity live stream when Adora and Catra have their kid they become the best parents they can and give their child all the love and activation that the two of them were denied from their childhood.

One of the themes of She-Ra is that it's never to late to change, but you MUST be the one to save yourself and WORK to redeem yourself. I understand that you don't see it that way and respect your opinion. I'm just telling you why I don't agree. Truce?
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4964
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by CharlesPhipps »

Hey, I'm very happy for people who the redemption arc worked for. I bear no animus to them and understand why it was a personal story that appealed to a lot of people.

I'm happy it was powerful and it's only my opinion.

:thumbs up:
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by Winter »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Jun 08, 2021 7:35 pm Hey, I'm very happy for people who the redemption arc worked for. I bear no animus to them and understand why it was a personal story that appealed to a lot of people.

I'm happy it was powerful and it's only my opinion.

:thumbs up:
Thank you, and at the very least we can agree on one thing... Kylo Ren's "Redemption Arc" sucks. With Anakin, Catra and Zuko the ground for their redemption WAS set up so when it happened people, for the most part, were able to except it. Sure, Vader's was very least minute but A) The inclusion of the Prequels help pick up some of the slack lacking in the Original Trilogy. B) Return of the Jedi showed Vader struggling between his loyalty to his master and the love for his son and C) We're told by Obi-Wan that Anakin was a good man.

Kylo is just a terrible person who became evil because "Darth Vader Fanboy" and later "The Devil Made Me Do It" and his reasons for becoming good was because he no longer wanted to be evil. Anakin wanted to protect his family, Catra always loved Adora and just wanted to be with her and to have friends besides Adora and Zuko wanted the love of his father and to regain his honor. There are goals that are noble or understandable here AND we see all these characters show that there is good within them they've just convinced themselves that it's dead or their twisted perspectives have convinced them that those noble qualities are evil in and of itself.

The closest thing to a good deed Kylo does throughout the Trilogy is to say that he understands and relates to Rey... This is just him manipulating and gaslighting her for his own gratification so he can defeat his uncle in something, in this case turning Rey to his side and any time she doesn't do what he wants he tries to kill her which is shown throughout the Trilogy.

Say what you will about Catra, at least she wanted to be better and showed compassion towards others like Scorpia and Entrapta. Say what you will, Catra never wanted to become Shadow Weaver.
User avatar
Beastro
Captain
Posts: 1150
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:14 am

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by Beastro »

Winter wrote: Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:36 amI've always felt that the Disney Trilogy as a whole didn't really have an arc and this backs up that idea by removing any and all motivation an arc MIGHT have had and boiling it down to "Let's just throw plot twists and awesome buttons at the audience in the conclusion"
FTFY
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Why Palpatine Influcing Kylo Ren was a Bad Idea

Post by Winter »

Beastro wrote: Wed Jun 09, 2021 9:58 pm
Winter wrote: Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:36 amI've always felt that the Disney Trilogy as a whole didn't really have an arc and this backs up that idea by removing any and all motivation an arc MIGHT have had and boiling it down to "Let's just throw plot twists and awesome buttons at the audience in the conclusion"
FTFY
If you're going to fix my poor spelling you're going to be here for a while. Dyslexia has no exasperation date and it's frankly a minor miracle if I managed to write a whole sentence without making a mistake.
Post Reply