Britney's Spear spied on by her own father.

[KitWargSpectacle]

On a slightly different note. Lately in the past couple of months Britney has been posting more and more semi nude videos or pictures of herself. Mainly hand bra pictures. And now in the past couple of days, a full on nude picture with the private parts blocked out.

I do wonder if this is somehow related to this whole mess with her father.

Sounds like she has no self-respect at all to me.

Time will tell. As always, time will tell.

Stereorypical rightoid lol

[CharlesPhipps]

The US court system is good and reasonable, and I trust those adults in the room - unless they're pro coughid measures of course, in which case they're going insane / making a powergrab against all our freedoms.

Today Kyle Rittenhouse's judge said they couldn't refer to the murder victims as victims but as "rioters" or "arsonists."

I don't trust the court system.

[KitWargSpectacle]

The US court system is good and reasonable, and I trust those adults in the room - unless they're pro coughid measures of course, in which case they're going insane / making a powergrab against all our freedoms.

Today Kyle Rittenhouse's judge said they couldn't refer to the murder victims as victims but as "rioters" or "arsonists."

I don't trust the court system.

Lol my comment was sarcastic, however this right here *isn't* a reason to distrust it - he's on video defending himself from those guys; they WERE rioters; with violent criminal record at that. If anything, his prosecution is the farce.

[Fuzzy Necromancer]

Buddy, you might need to start using sarcasm tags for better clarity.

[KitWargSpectacle]

Buddy, you might need to start using sarcasm tags for better clarity.

Nah that one was clear enough lol, some1 just wasn't paying attention.

[goodperson25]

Buddy, you might need to start using sarcasm tags for better clarity.

Nah that one was clear enough lol, some1 just wasn't paying attention.

Actually I understood the earlier comment (court system in general) much better than the later one (Rittenhouse specific) and I don't think it was only because of personal bias.

Regardless are you really surprised by accessibility being seen as a favourable goal?

[KitWargSpectacle]

Buddy, you might need to start using sarcasm tags for better clarity.

Nah that one was clear enough lol, some1 just wasn't paying attention.

Actually I understood the earlier comment (court system in general) much better than the later one (Rittenhouse specific) and I don't think it was only because of personal bias.

Regardless are you really surprised by accessibility being seen as a favourable goal?

The 2nd wasn't sarcasm.
The 1st was mocking the rightwingers (and in particular the one in this thread) who'll alternately praise the authorities or call them a bunch of lizard imposters depending on the partisan issue.

[BridgeConsoleMasher]

The US court system is good and reasonable, and I trust those adults in the room - unless they're pro coughid measures of course, in which case they're going insane / making a powergrab against all our freedoms.

Today Kyle Rittenhouse's judge said they couldn't refer to the murder victims as victims but as "rioters" or "arsonists."

I don't trust the court system.

Lol my comment was sarcastic, however this right here *isn't* a reason to distrust it - he's on video defending himself from those guys; they WERE rioters; with violent criminal record at that. If anything, his prosecution is the farce.

I'm a non familiar with the rittenhouse trial, I just like to yell at people who are on the other side of the political spectrum from me.

That being said this is kind of interesting. What was he doing wrong then, by your account?

[KitWargSpectacle]

The US court system is good and reasonable, and I trust those adults in the room - unless they're pro coughid measures of course, in which case they're going insane / making a powergrab against all our freedoms.

Today Kyle Rittenhouse's judge said they couldn't refer to the murder victims as victims but as "rioters" or "arsonists."

I don't trust the court system.

Lol my comment was sarcastic, however this right here *isn't* a reason to distrust it - he's on video defending himself from those guys; they WERE rioters; with violent criminal record at that. If anything, his prosecution is the farce.

I'm a non familiar with the rittenhouse trial, I just like to yell at people who are on the other side of the political spectrum from me.

That being said this is kind of interesting. What was he doing wrong then, by your account?

I don't know too much about it, but as far as I know he didn't really do anything wrong.

If Vaush, the anarcho-syndicalist marxist socialist with all the imaginable motivation to condemn him while exonerating the Antifa martyrs, wasn't able to say anything more convincing than "the leftists are good guys and would've embraced him if he dropped his arms and surrendered", then I doubt anyone can lol.

Given his ties to the Proudboys or whatnot, it's likely (though not guaranteed) that he's some kinda obnoxious smug /pol/lack though; if he's bad enough in that regard, I don't much care if he gets wronged by the court system tbh - but that's only if.

[Fuzzy Necromancer]

Murder is murder, even if the victims have criminal records. I'm not allowed to kill you just because you do something illegal, that's why we bother to have things like executions and trials. Kyle Rittenhouse was a spree killer and the prosecution was right to try him as such.