British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
Post Reply
User avatar
sayla0079
Captain
Posts: 749
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 1:07 am

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by sayla0079 »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 3:43 am So y'all think the old lady is still alive, then?
Yes if she wasn't once they got past U.k protocols if she had passed it would be all over the news.
Top
User avatar
Frustration
Captain
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by Frustration »

Why would Charles actually want to be King? There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit to the actual monarch.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Top
J!!
Captain
Posts: 869
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:52 pm

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by J!! »

Fun fact: as of today Barbados has cut ties with the British throne, and is now an independant republic.
Top
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:03 pm Why would Charles actually want to be King? There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit to the actual monarch.
Living in luxury at the public's expense is certainly a plus.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
Top
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3876
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by McAvoy »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:52 am
Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:03 pm Why would Charles actually want to be King? There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit to the actual monarch.
Living in luxury at the public's expense is certainly a plus.
And he doesn't already? Doesn't he already have a 'court' of his own?
I got nothing to say here.
Top
Draco Dracul
Captain
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:32 am

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by Draco Dracul »

Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:03 pm Why would Charles actually want to be King? There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit to the actual monarch.
Control over vast amounts of wealth and land isn't a benefit?
Top
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by clearspira »

J!! wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 1:16 am Fun fact: as of today Barbados has cut ties with the British throne, and is now an independant republic.
No great loss. This is a country that - no joke - during the same ceremony that Christened their new government made Rihanna a national hero.
Top
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by clearspira »

Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:03 pm Why would Charles actually want to be King? There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit to the actual monarch.
History. Prince Charles will be forgotten long before King Charles.
Top
User avatar
Beastro
Captain
Posts: 1150
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:14 am

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by Beastro »

Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:03 pm Why would Charles actually want to be King? There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit to the actual monarch.
Duty.

You may chuckle, but the Windsor's at least take their seriously still.
Top
User avatar
TGLS
Captain
Posts: 2930
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: British Queen "Enters a New Phase"

Post by TGLS »

clearspira wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 7:16 am
Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:03 pm Why would Charles actually want to be King? There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit to the actual monarch.
History. Prince Charles will be forgotten long before King Charles.
Yeah well, Charles I was a such a fuck-up he led to civil war and Charles II fought with parliament near constantly and fathered a dozen bastards. I'm not sure if Charles III (or more likely George VII) will be any more remembered than Edward VII (who ended his reign in a constitutional crisis).
Image
"I know what you’re thinking now. You’re thinking 'Oh my god, that’s treating other people with respect gone mad!'"
When I am writing in this font, I am writing in my moderator voice.
Spam-desu
Top
Post Reply

Return to “News”