There was never a window to stop it.Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:27 pm Man, we're really going to be dealing with this thing forever, as in Forever. The political will to actually deal with it isn't there, the window to stop it has been missed.
Coronavirus - the new pandemic
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
The vaccines reduce severity, so lethal cases are now merely moderately bad, bad cases are minor, and minor cases are asymptomatic.
The asymptomatic cases are still perfectly capable of spreading the virus, of course, given how infectious it is. There's just no longer any obvious sign that the person is sick.
In one sense, this is no different than before - people could transmit Covid before they developed symptoms. But now there isn't even a symptomatic period that makes it obvious.
The evolution of new strains will continue. And eventually, the moderate resistance granted by the vaccines runs out. How many people will persist in getting booster shots when the issue seems to have been resolved? Hopefully those who are genuinely at-risk will keep it up - what the others do doesn't truly matter, since they can receive and spread the illness either way.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
There's plenty of evidence that current strains are less dangerous anyway, and that for many the vaccine effectiveness will have declined quite significantly by now.Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:41 pmThe vaccines reduce severity, so lethal cases are now merely moderately bad, bad cases are minor, and minor cases are asymptomatic.
The asymptomatic cases are still perfectly capable of spreading the virus, of course, given how infectious it is. There's just no longer any obvious sign that the person is sick.
In one sense, this is no different than before - people could transmit Covid before they developed symptoms. But now there isn't even a symptomatic period that makes it obvious.
The evolution of new strains will continue. And eventually, the moderate resistance granted by the vaccines runs out. How many people will persist in getting booster shots when the issue seems to have been resolved? Hopefully those who are genuinely at-risk will keep it up - what the others do doesn't truly matter, since they can receive and spread the illness either way.
If plenty of people aren't even being symptomatic that's not a sign of a particularly dangerous disease. Yes, it can still hit some people very severely, but we live with a vast mulitude of things of equivalent risk.
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11631
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Yeah like stress from talking on internet forums!!Riedquat wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 9:49 pmThere's plenty of evidence that current strains are less dangerous anyway, and that for many the vaccine effectiveness will have declined quite significantly by now.Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:41 pmThe vaccines reduce severity, so lethal cases are now merely moderately bad, bad cases are minor, and minor cases are asymptomatic.
The asymptomatic cases are still perfectly capable of spreading the virus, of course, given how infectious it is. There's just no longer any obvious sign that the person is sick.
In one sense, this is no different than before - people could transmit Covid before they developed symptoms. But now there isn't even a symptomatic period that makes it obvious.
The evolution of new strains will continue. And eventually, the moderate resistance granted by the vaccines runs out. How many people will persist in getting booster shots when the issue seems to have been resolved? Hopefully those who are genuinely at-risk will keep it up - what the others do doesn't truly matter, since they can receive and spread the illness either way.
If plenty of people aren't even being symptomatic that's not a sign of a particularly dangerous disease. Yes, it can still hit some people very severely, but we live with a vast mulitude of things of equivalent risk.
..What mirror universe?
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
There was.Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:36 pmThere was never a window to stop it.Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:27 pm Man, we're really going to be dealing with this thing forever, as in Forever. The political will to actually deal with it isn't there, the window to stop it has been missed.
Could have Eminent Domained the copyright on the vaccine. Could have opened up the supply lines. Could have let the world vaccinate back when vaccines would have mattered.
Didn't, because capitalism.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Could have started working on a Vaccine sooner if Trump had gotten off his ass and stopped acting like it was a hoax when there were inklings of it months before the news broke.
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
The vaccines don't stop the spread of the virus. They don't even slow it down. If anything, they encourage its spread, by reducing the symptoms of people who otherwise might isolate themselves.
Why is it people are so resistant to acknowledging simple facts? In FN's case, it's because it's FN, but there are lots of others who just can't bring themselves to face reality on this topic.
Why is it people are so resistant to acknowledging simple facts? In FN's case, it's because it's FN, but there are lots of others who just can't bring themselves to face reality on this topic.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
There's a lot of could have, should have, would have, but there is no point in dwelling on them.
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
The only real window we had was the initial stages from spreading. Even then, that would have been a gigantic task. After that then it was here to stay.Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 6:42 amThere was.Frustration wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:36 pmThere was never a window to stop it.Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:27 pm Man, we're really going to be dealing with this thing forever, as in Forever. The political will to actually deal with it isn't there, the window to stop it has been missed.
Could have Eminent Domained the copyright on the vaccine. Could have opened up the supply lines. Could have let the world vaccinate back when vaccines would have mattered.
Didn't, because capitalism.
I mean the only probably to kill the virus would be a 100% pure quarantine. No one allowed outside. No contact with anyone but people who live in the same household.
Logistically that was impossible and as a society would have never happened.
I got nothing to say here.
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus - the new pandemic
Given our inability to keep people from crossing our southern border, there's simply no way we could have prevented Covid from entering as well. Even the older strains of the virus, which were less contagious than the recent ones, were still highly communicable, and transmittable before symptoms were obvious.
We could perhaps have stopped the virus from coming in through other means, if we'd shut down every form of international travel at once and quarantined all passengers indefinitely. Although there are some indications that the virus was already spreading before it was recognized. But ultimately it would have made little difference - how long could that be kept up?
What Covid has done is twofold: it's shown us how much harm people will put up with when they're frightened, and it's shown us how poorly prepared we are if a truly dangerous disease begins to spread. We're willing to drive the child suicide rate through the roof, but not to forbid food delivery.
We could perhaps have stopped the virus from coming in through other means, if we'd shut down every form of international travel at once and quarantined all passengers indefinitely. Although there are some indications that the virus was already spreading before it was recognized. But ultimately it would have made little difference - how long could that be kept up?
What Covid has done is twofold: it's shown us how much harm people will put up with when they're frightened, and it's shown us how poorly prepared we are if a truly dangerous disease begins to spread. We're willing to drive the child suicide rate through the roof, but not to forbid food delivery.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984