phantom000 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 22, 2022 1:10 pm
I understand the importance of social and emotional learning, but I think that would come mostly from the classroom environment, as in from their fellow students and instructors. I seriously doubt how much SEL a student would learn from a text book.
Also, this is a math book! If it was just one or two places I would be inclined not to care, but the page mentions that these are not an exhaustive list which suggests that such things are found throughout the text book.
Well two points:
I still don't understand what's so objectionable about SEL that textbooks that include SEL related material need to be refused as a valid textbook. When I was in elementary and secondary school, I remember that entire units were skipped over, not just individual lessons. Somebody had to write the SEL pages, and they probably take up more space, so either the book is thicker and more expensive, or the book has less math content, or something. If the material isn't flatly objectionable, let the school boards decide whether or not they want to buy a textbook with wasted pages.
This isn't one math book, this is 54 math books. 28 were rejected for prohibited topics and unsolicited strategies (i.e. "CRT", SEL & Common Core). 12 were rejected for not meeting state standards. 14 were rejected because of both. Not an exhaustive list could mean:
-> In that textbook that had the data taken from some survey about bias, there was a question that related to race or whatever in every lesson.
-> In that textbook that had the data taken from some survey about bias, those were the only two questions in the entire textbook, and that was enough to warrant rejection.
How many of the 54 textbooks were taken out because of each topic? Unclear, but no more than 42. The government of Florida may be posturing for their base and only rejected a few textbooks over "CRT", or there may have been many and the press release was correct to highlight "CRT".