Wokeness or Something

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2307
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by Winter »

hammerofglass wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:39 pm "Woke" just means "contains stuff conservative Culture Warriors complain about". They've appropriated it so thoroughly that nobody else uses it unironically anymore. Give somebody who isn't a straight white Christian cis man a speaking role and it's "woke".
Another example, let's say you have a standard 90's action type of movie that is pure 90's cheese despite being released today. It has action, adventure and a white male lead who has hot love interest. Now here's the twist, the love interest is a trans woman. Her being trans is not the focus of her character and is only brought up once and naturally in dialogue. She herself is a badass and presented just as awesome as the leading man who is not even slightly bothered by her being trans.

Headlines make much ado about this awesome trans lead and her fantastic chemistry with the hero of the story and how this is a great step forward for trans representation. However, the film being well liked by critics and movie goers the film doesn't break any records and in many ways, under performs at the box office.

And than here comes the anti-woke culture with them saying the reason this film bombed was because the film was forcing it's political agenda on viewers and that if the film just had a cisgender female lead it would have been fine because most people going to see films aren't into trans women, even though, again, it wasn't treated as a big deal by the film itself. And the reason the film didn't do to well was more of a result of poor marketing and being released to few to no theaters but again, that's not what matters to these people, what matters is it bombed and there for is another example of how being "Woke" is bad.

And I know this would be the reaction because I've seen this sort of argument used again the 2012 film Dredd. Because gave the Anderson equal screen time to Dredd and gave her more development but ultaimtely bombed it was assumed by a SMALL majority that she was the reason to blame for it failing. No one took the idea of that seriously because the whole Woke thing wasn't really a thing but if released today and if it bombed like it did before, would be surprised if that opinion was given more attention?

The thing about Woke is it's a scapegoat. TDST didn't do well, that's because it had a diverse cast with a female lead and not because it was a poorly executed mess of a Trilogy that fell apart because everyone kept trying to ignore what came before. Voyager wasn't as good as TNG, that's because it had a female captain and not because the show kept hitting the reset button and had weak characters and a wasted premise. Dragon Age 2 wasn't as good as DAO that's because most of everyone was bi and not because it was rushed through development so the flaws of the work couldn't be worked out.

And those later two examples are indicative of opinions by critics and fans at the time not people coming in to add to the argument later. The reason Woke dominates so many conversations is because it's a fad of sorts, one that is held by loud minorities NOT the majority and only gained the attention it did thanks to the 2016 Ghostbusters film and TDST and a few others.

Contrary to what clearspira may say every story I listed in our argument WAS a success to one degree or another and all were Woke as it did just the thing you said
Give somebody who isn't a straight white Christian cis man a speaking role and it's "woke".
Which manages to be vague enough to apply to anything but will be ignored if the work is well received by the vast majority. To go back to She-Ra that show is as woke as one can get and is loved by pretty much anyone. It was given 5 full season deal and was able to see that deal through to the end and it's still talked about a lot 3 years after it's release.

Or, just look at clearspira's arguments against SOME of the stories I brought up. Those aren't woke, they're as far from Woke as you can get. Even though, again, woke is counted as anything that does not resolve solely around white American cis men AND cannot include anything political. Red Dwarf is woke by that very argument because the it has two white men both of whom would be regarded as "bad" by anti-woker because they're not super awesome and the show delves into some serious subjects with mixed race lead at it's center. But the show is a pop-culture icon that's loved by millions so it's not woke despite ticking off every woke box because Shut Up.
User avatar
hammerofglass
Captain
Posts: 2614
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
Location: Corning, NY

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by hammerofglass »

...yep.
...for space is wide, and good friends are too few.
User avatar
Frustration
Captain
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by Frustration »

Red Dwarf isn't 'woke'.

I don't have enough experience with some other of the shows mentioned to judge, but that one certainly isn't woke.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2307
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by Winter »

Frustration wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 11:31 pm Red Dwarf isn't 'woke'.

I don't have enough experience with some other of the shows mentioned to judge, but that one certainly isn't woke.
How does one define Woke. By the definition of how it's been presented it's if cis white men are presented in a negative light, that has someone who is not a white man as the lead and brings up political issues which range from class, race, sexuality and religion. The issue I have with Woke and what makes something woke is that it's often insufferably vague. Red Dwarf hits all those points that I mentioned so, in all seriousness, how is RD not woke?

Hell, to use a show clearspira themselves used as how representation should be used with Coronation Street, Hayley who is trans in the show the issue of her being trans IS a big point in a few episodes as is the issue of gay rights. And the person who is against Hayley and gay rights is a straw man meant to be seen as in the wrong.

Even Hayley coming out as trans is treated as a big thing as the show draws attention to it. So, by the vagueness of what is Woke Coronation Street should be seen as such. The argument presented with the whole, GWGB doesn't hold because what is and isn't woke is left vague so one show that ticks off all the points of what is woke isn't woke and what could be seen as anti-woke is seen as woke.

Let's look at The Last Jedi for a moment. That film is accused of being Super Woke with toxic men, powerful women and has a Asian and Black co-lead. And yet, Rey is more of a pawn in the conflict between Luke and Kylo and is tossed aside when she is no longer relevant to that conflict (notice that she has less screen time and dialogue in the forth act (about 5 or 6 minutes I think)). She also fallows the standard "I can fix this terrible person with LOVE" BS and falls in love with Kylo just because he says he's the victim in all this.

Rose is openly abusive towards Finn and both are presented as idiots who nearly get everyone killed due to their plan. The Hispanic man is presented as angry and in need of his White Superiors to sow him that violence is not the only answer to everything. And Holdo is presented as an arrogant idiot who nearly gets everyone killed and is only useful when she gets herself killed.

Is this woke? After all this plays to stereo types and plays them straight or is this just reading into something that isn't there? Is Red Dwarf anti-woke even though it presents women as smart, the mixed race man as being greater then he is? Rimmer is pathetic, Kryten is rather feminine and Cat is just awesome. Sure most of the cast is dumb but that's part of the point of the series, that everyone here has potential to be more then what they are... but their still kinda dumb.

My point is, with just enough effort in how something is framed ANYTHING can be Woke or Anti-Woke. Woke is meant to be vague so if something fails and has some form of diversity in it then it can be choked up to being to woke and that's why it fails.
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2307
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by Winter »

Thebestoftherest wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 3:20 am One legit criticism I have is this is our hero origin and they seems to be going bigger and bigger and I feel it might not work in the long run.
I haven't see much of Ms. Marvel yet but I do feel that the MCU as a whole needs to go smaller for a bit. We just saved the world and via Time Heist, can we hold off on everything being in danger for a one week. My favorite MCU series on the whole has been Hawkeye and Ant-Man and the Wasp and neither of them have a world ending threat. It's just a bunch of people trying not to die and save their loved ones. I mean in Phase One the world was never really in danger until Captain America and The Avengers. Other worlds were at risk but for the most part the danger to Earth was usually whether or not one location would be destroyed via monster or killer robots.

Give the world a break, it's been through enough.
User avatar
hammerofglass
Captain
Posts: 2614
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
Location: Corning, NY

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by hammerofglass »

...for space is wide, and good friends are too few.
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4928
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by CharlesPhipps »

Woke is meaningless when used as a pejorative. It also doesn't affect the sales of anything as even if the complainers are vast, they hate-watch and drive up sales.

No such thing as bad publicity.
stryke
Captain
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:42 am

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by stryke »

Lister and Rimmer full on tongue snogged in a fantasy sequence, Cat is in love with himself, and yes even when the version is external like in Camille, while Kryten showed Lister pictures of his dick for reassurance and while Lister was obviously shocked he was willing to inspect his mate's lower parts and let him know there was nothing to be worried about. Kochanski, as much as I may have disliked the seasons she was in entirely due to the dissolutions of the gestalt entity that had been writing the show, was always the smartest, most capable person in the room.

Red Dwarf was blazing those Woke trails that people are still not up to fully embracing yet in terms of genre telly.
User avatar
Frustration
Captain
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by Frustration »

Lister was a lazy slob who shared the lowest possible rank on the ship with a neurotic underachiving lunatic; his only redeeming feature was his profound concern for ethics. Cat was absurdly vain. Because it's a comedic parody of the science-fiction tradition, not because it's compliant with current sociological ideologies of the left.

What, I suppose you'd also have us believe Holly's gender presentation was a signal about transsexuality?
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
stryke
Captain
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:42 am

Re: Ms. Marvel on Disney+

Post by stryke »

Ooh forgot that one, sure sounds good to me :D
Locked