She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
User avatar
hammerofglass
Captain
Posts: 2627
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
Location: Corning, NY

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by hammerofglass »

clearspira wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 5:31 pm
hammerofglass wrote: Sat Aug 27, 2022 1:24 pm
clearspira wrote: Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:00 am
hammerofglass wrote: Sat Aug 27, 2022 1:29 am The only hate I've seen is from the exact people everyone knew was going to hate it the day they announced it. The "it has a woman lead so it's woke and anti-man" crowd.
She Hulk was first created back in 1980. Y'know, back when 90% of comic book fans were male? And she was wildly successful.

So... you can peddle this "guys hate her because of sexism" line as much as you like, that is the standard card to play whenever one of these properties fail after all, but then you have to explain the original She Hulk's popularity first. Good luck with that.
I didn't say "guys", I said a specific group of guys. A loud minority, but a small enough one that companies are ignoring them.

But yes I did mean you. You specifically. Because you were going to do that exact rant before I said something and stole your thunder, weren't you?
I like the show. Its not a classic, but its funny enough and I already liked the character going in.

I suspect that is the last thing you wanted to hear. But we have already established that you consider me to be a Nazi. And I consider you to be an easily offended crybaby who enjoys playing the ism, ist and phobe cards whenever you don't like what someone is saying. Life is life, you can't please everyone.
Um, no? Because I think you're a real person and not a one dimensional caricature? I actually like you as a person other than you being an easily offended crybaby who enjoys saying anything not catering to you is an attack on you. You're a bit naive, but I don't think you're malicious or anything. I have lifelong friends that I disagree with more on politics than I do with you.

Seriously I live in Trump country dude, you're far left by my local standards.

Edit: And I'm glad you like the show. So do I.
When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3915
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by McAvoy »

clearspira wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 5:31 pm
hammerofglass wrote: Sat Aug 27, 2022 1:24 pm
clearspira wrote: Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:00 am
hammerofglass wrote: Sat Aug 27, 2022 1:29 am The only hate I've seen is from the exact people everyone knew was going to hate it the day they announced it. The "it has a woman lead so it's woke and anti-man" crowd.
She Hulk was first created back in 1980. Y'know, back when 90% of comic book fans were male? And she was wildly successful.

So... you can peddle this "guys hate her because of sexism" line as much as you like, that is the standard card to play whenever one of these properties fail after all, but then you have to explain the original She Hulk's popularity first. Good luck with that.
I didn't say "guys", I said a specific group of guys. A loud minority, but a small enough one that companies are ignoring them.

But yes I did mean you. You specifically. Because you were going to do that exact rant before I said something and stole your thunder, weren't you?
I like the show. Its not a classic, but its funny enough and I already liked the character going in.

I suspect that is the last thing you wanted to hear. But we have already established that you consider me to be a Nazi. And I consider you to be an easily offended crybaby who enjoys playing the ism, ist and phobe cards whenever you don't like what someone is saying. Life is life, you can't please everyone.
The problem with you is that you have established a reputation for being 'anti-woke'. So most of us are going to automatically assume that that would be pro anti She Hulk.

No one here thinks you are a Nazi.
I got nothing to say here.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by clearspira »

Tangent time: one of my main bugbears with the MCU to date is how they've just kind of forgotten that the Thanos snap occurred. Society was collapsing in Endgame; crime, PTSD, resource troubles. And yet come Spider-Man 2 and 3, its all just kind of... solved? The only consequence seems to be that Peter and MJ are held back at school. It should logically have taken more than just everyone popping back into existence for society to get back to where it was, especially with the likes of Tony Stark dead.

Anyway, I bring this up because imagine how many truly great legal stories could result from the Snap. Wills that may have paid out, someone who moved into your house in the intervening time, whoever is cleaning up what Hawkeye did, someone taking your job. And yet She-Hulk, like the wider MCU, is not taking advantage of it.
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11637
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

clearspira wrote: Sun Sep 04, 2022 9:38 pm Tangent time: one of my main bugbears with the MCU to date is how they've just kind of forgotten that the Thanos snap occurred. Society was collapsing in Endgame; crime, PTSD, resource troubles. And yet come Spider-Man 2 and 3, its all just kind of... solved? The only consequence seems to be that Peter and MJ are held back at school. It should logically have taken more than just everyone popping back into existence for society to get back to where it was, especially with the likes of Tony Stark dead.

Anyway, I bring this up because imagine how many truly great legal stories could result from the Snap. Wills that may have paid out, someone who moved into your house in the intervening time, whoever is cleaning up what Hawkeye did, someone taking your job. And yet She-Hulk, like the wider MCU, is not taking advantage of it.
Falcon and the Winter Soldier's antagonists are terrorists acting out on the outset of the snap.
..What mirror universe?
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6322
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

I think the CGI could be a lot better. This is what you get when you have SFX done by overmanaged non-union labor on crunch time. And she needs to be bigger in her hulk form. She's not even buff.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3915
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by McAvoy »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:39 am I think the CGI could be a lot better. This is what you get when you have SFX done by overmanaged non-union labor on crunch time. And she needs to be bigger in her hulk form. She's not even buff.
Yeah that's my big thing. Her CGI looks seems off. And I do agree she should be more muscular.
I got nothing to say here.
User avatar
hammerofglass
Captain
Posts: 2627
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
Location: Corning, NY

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by hammerofglass »

I noticed in the third episode her speaking animation seems to be out of sync, like it's lagging a quarter second.
When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3915
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by McAvoy »

hammerofglass wrote: Tue Sep 06, 2022 1:07 am I noticed in the third episode her speaking animation seems to be out of sync, like it's lagging a quarter second.
It might be that. It's definitely something with the face. Might be too flawless, mouth movement, or something.
I got nothing to say here.
Thebestoftherest
Captain
Posts: 3748
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:22 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by Thebestoftherest »

McAvoy wrote: Tue Sep 06, 2022 12:47 am
Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:39 am I think the CGI could be a lot better. This is what you get when you have SFX done by overmanaged non-union labor on crunch time. And she needs to be bigger in her hulk form. She's not even buff.
Yeah that's my big thing. Her CGI looks seems off. And I do agree she should be more muscular.
I hear a rumor, that the artist wanted her to be so, but Disney being ran by a bunch of out of touch old people insist of having her be the more lean female form.
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11637
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

Yeah I get the feeling that the animation’s style is subtly extravagant as a deliberate measure.
..What mirror universe?
Post Reply