She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
Post Reply
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4956
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by CharlesPhipps »

clearspira wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:55 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:19 pm I wish we'd never mention the Snap again.
Why?
Because if they want to set it in "our" world, then it would be the single most defining event of human history and brought up constantly, effecting everyone's life, choices, and materials. Everything from religion to personal relationships.

And the world would be NOTHING like ours.
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3915
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by McAvoy »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:12 pm
clearspira wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:55 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:19 pm I wish we'd never mention the Snap again.
Why?
Because if they want to set it in "our" world, then it would be the single most defining event of human history and brought up constantly, effecting everyone's life, choices, and materials. Everything from religion to personal relationships.

And the world would be NOTHING like ours.
The whole concept of it being our world went out the window long ago.

26 movies and many TV series all for the most part interconnected pretty makes it entirely seperate from our own.
I got nothing to say here.
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by Madner Kami »

Thebestoftherest wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:51 amI hear a rumor, that the artist wanted her to be so, but Disney being ran by a bunch of out of touch old people insist of having her be the more lean female form.
Or maybe they deliberately took more inspiration from the Byrne-era She-Hulk, rather than some more modern interpretations.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3915
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by McAvoy »

Madner Kami wrote: Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:43 am
Thebestoftherest wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:51 amI hear a rumor, that the artist wanted her to be so, but Disney being ran by a bunch of out of touch old people insist of having her be the more lean female form.
Or maybe they deliberately took more inspiration from the Byrne-era She-Hulk, rather than some more modern interpretations.
What modern interpretations? Her muscle size was pretty big even in the 80's. She was never protrayed as muscled close to even female bodybuilders but she has muscle definition.
I got nothing to say here.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by clearspira »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:12 pm
clearspira wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:55 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:19 pm I wish we'd never mention the Snap again.
Why?
Because if they want to set it in "our" world, then it would be the single most defining event of human history and brought up constantly, effecting everyone's life, choices, and materials. Everything from religion to personal relationships.

And the world would be NOTHING like ours.
Please name me one thing prior to the snap that convinced you the MCU is set in our world. And why the introduction of the multiverse hasn't convinced you yet why it isn't.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by clearspira »

McAvoy wrote: Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:54 am
Madner Kami wrote: Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:43 am
Thebestoftherest wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:51 amI hear a rumor, that the artist wanted her to be so, but Disney being ran by a bunch of out of touch old people insist of having her be the more lean female form.
Or maybe they deliberately took more inspiration from the Byrne-era She-Hulk, rather than some more modern interpretations.
What modern interpretations? Her muscle size was pretty big even in the 80's. She was never protrayed as muscled close to even female bodybuilders but she has muscle definition.
My theory - and it is just a theory - is that even though Disney is very much ''grrr I am woman hear me roar'' in public nowadays, behind the scenes they are also scared of losing the very lucrative ''sex sells'' market. And generally, men and lesbians are not interested in ''Hulk Hogan'' type women, and women are not interested in becoming ''Hulk Hogan'' type women. Abby from ''The Last of Us'' should have ended that idea.

DC were the same. Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman is a stick compared to many of her portrayals.
User avatar
TGLS
Captain
Posts: 2932
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by TGLS »

clearspira wrote: Mon Sep 19, 2022 1:12 pm
CharlesPhipps wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:12 pm
clearspira wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:55 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:19 pm I wish we'd never mention the Snap again.
Why?
Because if they want to set it in "our" world, then it would be the single most defining event of human history and brought up constantly, effecting everyone's life, choices, and materials. Everything from religion to personal relationships.

And the world would be NOTHING like ours.
Please name me one thing prior to the snap that convinced you the MCU is set in our world. And why the introduction of the multiverse hasn't convinced you yet why it isn't.
The MCU is a universe that's just like our world, unless otherwise noted. Consider the rise of social media and smartphones since 2006 for example. That's been keeping pace at about the same rate. Changes are kept to a minimum.

For example, consider everything that would change following the first movie, Iron Man. Even if he didn't want to sell the suits wholesale to the US army, he has a tiny generator of apparently unlimited clean free energy. They could have taken nearly every gas guzzler off the road by 2016 through attrition. But they didn't, because the point is to keep everything the same enough so the world's recognizable.

It's the same deal with the snap. The more you acknowledge the snap, the more you're drawing attention to the fact the snap changed nothing.
Image
"I know what you’re thinking now. You’re thinking 'Oh my god, that’s treating other people with respect gone mad!'"
When I am writing in this font, I am writing in my moderator voice.
Spam-desu
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by Madner Kami »

The eternal stasis of the comic-book-world. The greatest contributor to modern-day media-perception and media-shaping. Fuck that.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by clearspira »

TGLS wrote: Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:11 pm
clearspira wrote: Mon Sep 19, 2022 1:12 pm
CharlesPhipps wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:12 pm
clearspira wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:55 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Fri Sep 09, 2022 7:19 pm I wish we'd never mention the Snap again.
Why?
Because if they want to set it in "our" world, then it would be the single most defining event of human history and brought up constantly, effecting everyone's life, choices, and materials. Everything from religion to personal relationships.

And the world would be NOTHING like ours.
Please name me one thing prior to the snap that convinced you the MCU is set in our world. And why the introduction of the multiverse hasn't convinced you yet why it isn't.
The MCU is a universe that's just like our world, unless otherwise noted. Consider the rise of social media and smartphones since 2006 for example. That's been keeping pace at about the same rate. Changes are kept to a minimum.

For example, consider everything that would change following the first movie, Iron Man. Even if he didn't want to sell the suits wholesale to the US army, he has a tiny generator of apparently unlimited clean free energy. They could have taken nearly every gas guzzler off the road by 2016 through attrition. But they didn't, because the point is to keep everything the same enough so the world's recognizable.

It's the same deal with the snap. The more you acknowledge the snap, the more you're drawing attention to the fact the snap changed nothing.
Really makes it all seem kind of pointless when put like that. The eternal status quo.
User avatar
hammerofglass
Captain
Posts: 2627
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
Location: Corning, NY

Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law

Post by hammerofglass »

And if a change does stick the universe gets regularly rebooted anyway.
When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.
Post Reply