Yeah, I'll finish this season but I don't think I'll be seeing a second season if they have onehammerofglass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:47 pm Just seems like a standard sitcom to me. No stakes, no meaningful arc, just some stuff that happened.
She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
-
- Captain
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:22 pm
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
Maybe that is a better description.hammerofglass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:47 pm Just seems like a standard sitcom to me. No stakes, no meaningful arc, just some stuff that happened.
So we are watching a character navigate her personal life as a celebrity super hero. And no one cares about her human self. It does feel like a sitcom.
I got nothing to say here.
- hammerofglass
- Captain
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
- Location: Corning, NY
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
The arc of the unholy lovechild of a redpill forum and Kiwi Farms trying to destroy her life for no particular reason is honestly making the latest episode it a bit too realistic for my taste.
Did like their version of Daredevil and that whole story, that was fun. Then everything after "shouldn't this episode be over"? sucked all the air out of the room.
Did like their version of Daredevil and that whole story, that was fun. Then everything after "shouldn't this episode be over"? sucked all the air out of the room.
...for space is wide, and good friends are too few.
- clearspira
- Overlord
- Posts: 5676
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
Have hate groups launched a campaign against the show? Probably.
But I also find "review bombing" to be a very convenient excuse and is now "default excuse number 1" to explain away bad ratings. Ultimately, they are not a very large group of people. And from what I've seen of this actress of Twitter, she has not been quick to take any accountability. I think she thinks this is a work of art.
Those masks are definitely inspired by Doomcock. A bad move if that move was to insult him as he'll think of it as a badge of honour and just strengthens his appeal.
But I also find "review bombing" to be a very convenient excuse and is now "default excuse number 1" to explain away bad ratings. Ultimately, they are not a very large group of people. And from what I've seen of this actress of Twitter, she has not been quick to take any accountability. I think she thinks this is a work of art.
Those masks are definitely inspired by Doomcock. A bad move if that move was to insult him as he'll think of it as a badge of honour and just strengthens his appeal.
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
To be fair, not many people rate all the media they watch, so a small group can have an outsized effect.
- hammerofglass
- Captain
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
- Location: Corning, NY
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
If they already had shots prepared against The Usual Suspects using their normal talking points when they were writing this two years ago or so, then it's a pretty safe bet that whole demographic was already written off in the pitch meeting.
Like you said, not enough of them for Disney to care about.
Anecdotally just from people I know it's the first Marvel property to really grab the "50+ geek women" demographic since the X-Men trilogy. They knew exactly what they were doing.
Like you said, not enough of them for Disney to care about.
Anecdotally just from people I know it's the first Marvel property to really grab the "50+ geek women" demographic since the X-Men trilogy. They knew exactly what they were doing.
...for space is wide, and good friends are too few.
- clearspira
- Overlord
- Posts: 5676
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
Doomcock's latest video talking about the controversy has some of the highest views and Likes of any of his videos ever and is seeing a continuous uptick in subs according to Social Blade - basically Disney has just failed Troll 101: don't feed them.
Regardless of where you stand on this, is this where Disney is now? Getting salty over Youtubers? Moreover, is this where this show is now?
Regardless of where you stand on this, is this where Disney is now? Getting salty over Youtubers? Moreover, is this where this show is now?
- hammerofglass
- Captain
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:17 pm
- Location: Corning, NY
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
Nothing wrong with giving small creators a shout-out.
...for space is wide, and good friends are too few.
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
So I finally watched the episode. Those guys were up for maybe ten seconds. It was masks and they distorted their voices. Outside the look of the masks and distorting their voices they did nothing that would remotely show they are imitating Doomcock.clearspira wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 5:34 pm Doomcock's latest video talking about the controversy has some of the highest views and Likes of any of his videos ever and is seeing a continuous uptick in subs according to Social Blade - basically Disney has just failed Troll 101: don't feed them.
Regardless of where you stand on this, is this where Disney is now? Getting salty over Youtubers? Moreover, is this where this show is now?
Rewatch that scene and tell me this isn't just a maked group that distorted their voice.
I got nothing to say here.
- clearspira
- Overlord
- Posts: 5676
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm
Re: She/Hulk: Attorney at Law
Tbh... I have to agree with you. The first time through I was definitely like ''Doomcock!'' but watching it again with what you said in mind, they could just be a spooky gang. They could even be Dr Who villains.McAvoy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 8:22 amSo I finally watched the episode. Those guys were up for maybe ten seconds. It was masks and they distorted their voices. Outside the look of the masks and distorting their voices they did nothing that would remotely show they are imitating Doomcock.clearspira wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 5:34 pm Doomcock's latest video talking about the controversy has some of the highest views and Likes of any of his videos ever and is seeing a continuous uptick in subs according to Social Blade - basically Disney has just failed Troll 101: don't feed them.
Regardless of where you stand on this, is this where Disney is now? Getting salty over Youtubers? Moreover, is this where this show is now?
Rewatch that scene and tell me this isn't just a maked group that distorted their voice.
That changes the effect of the scene in my mind from ''salty burn'' to ''they have no idea who Doomcock is'' which is also pretty funny.
I also prefer to think of it your way as I really do not want this to be the norm. Disney shouldn't be rising to the bait of niche Youtubers as no good comes of it and it just looks unprofessional. Especially as Doomcock in particular is chief Fandom Menace, and going after him kind of makes it look like he was right about one of your biggest franchises.