Film: Serenity
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Film: Serenity
But everyone knows the Confederates were monsters and the Unionites were saints, because slavery. Slavery!
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
- Madner Kami
- Captain
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm
Re: Film: Serenity
You're kidding, right?McAvoy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 6:27 amIn the US, we had a Civil War with the losing side top General has never been called a war criminal. General Lee.clearspira wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 7:44 am The only difference between ''general'' and ''war criminal'' is the winner.
But there could be an argument made about the winning side with the Union Army about war crimes.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
- Makeshift Python
- Captain
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:37 pm
Re: Film: Serenity
No heroism? He got the crew to the signal they needed to get to just before dying. Without his skills, they would have never made it.clearspira wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:36 am 3) Killing Wash? No. Just no. And it was such a Tasha Yar death as well. No meaning to it, no heroism. He just dies and the film moves on save for the bit with the dinosaurs.
There would only be no meaning or heroism if Mal didn't broadcast the signal. He would have died for nothing. But that's not how it played out.
Re: Film: Serenity
No heroism in the actual death. It was just random and out of nowhere. It also didn't influence the plot in any way.Makeshift Python wrote: ↑Sun Mar 05, 2023 6:45 pmNo heroism? He got the crew to the signal they needed to get to just before dying. Without his skills, they would have never made it.clearspira wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:36 am 3) Killing Wash? No. Just no. And it was such a Tasha Yar death as well. No meaning to it, no heroism. He just dies and the film moves on save for the bit with the dinosaurs.
There would only be no meaning or heroism if Mal didn't broadcast the signal. He would have died for nothing. But that's not how it played out.
- Madner Kami
- Captain
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm
Re: Film: Serenity
Vash didn't die saving the crew. Vash died specifically after the crash landing was done, by being impaled out of nowhere. It's just a petty kill because the actor couldn't comit to a sequel and not a heroic "My Life for your Life!".Makeshift Python wrote: ↑Sun Mar 05, 2023 6:45 pmNo heroism? He got the crew to the signal they needed to get to just before dying. Without his skills, they would have never made it.clearspira wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:36 am 3) Killing Wash? No. Just no. And it was such a Tasha Yar death as well. No meaning to it, no heroism. He just dies and the film moves on save for the bit with the dinosaurs.
There would only be no meaning or heroism if Mal didn't broadcast the signal. He would have died for nothing. But that's not how it played out.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Film: Serenity
Actual death is usually sudden, unexpected, and meaningless. It's a mark of how good the writing is that they can make drama out of realistic events rather than 'dramatic' ones.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: Film: Serenity
It absolutely counts as a heroic sacrifice. Everything from the moment they drew the Reavers attention to when they broadcast the signal was all one mission, a mission where they knew going in that tons of people would be shooting at them the entire time. Anyone who dies in the course of that effort, dies doing something heroic.
What you may be getting at is that Wash's death didn't in some way advance their heroic goals - if they'd been sitting a little to the side and hadn't been impaled, the rest of the movie could have continued unchanged. But that seems like a very narrow definition of heroic sacrifice.
Like, if a firefighter carries someone out of a burning building, but on their way out something inside explodes and the blast kills them (but not the person they rescued) I would absolutely count that as a heroic death, even though the firefighter's death wasn't strictly necessary to save that other person.
What you may be getting at is that Wash's death didn't in some way advance their heroic goals - if they'd been sitting a little to the side and hadn't been impaled, the rest of the movie could have continued unchanged. But that seems like a very narrow definition of heroic sacrifice.
Like, if a firefighter carries someone out of a burning building, but on their way out something inside explodes and the blast kills them (but not the person they rescued) I would absolutely count that as a heroic death, even though the firefighter's death wasn't strictly necessary to save that other person.
- Madner Kami
- Captain
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm
Re: Film: Serenity
No. The firefighter goes in, saves the people, sits down to take a breather and suddenly gets struck by lightning. That is a more appropriate comparison.
Or wait, it was a Reaver spear, wasn't it? Well, the firefighter sits down on a fire-truck to take a breather and something in the house explodes, sending debries flying and gets impaled by a broom. That's Final Destination, not a heroic death.
Or wait, it was a Reaver spear, wasn't it? Well, the firefighter sits down on a fire-truck to take a breather and something in the house explodes, sending debries flying and gets impaled by a broom. That's Final Destination, not a heroic death.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
Re: Film: Serenity
You're acting like the entire mission for Wash was simply "get down to the surface", and that once they did, their job was done. That's not the case. The mission was to broadcast the Miranda message across the system - landing on the surface of that moon was simply one step in completing that mission. When Wash died, they were still in the middle of their heroic endeavor.
Re: Film: Serenity
But the manner of his death, the impact of it, would've been the same if he hadn't died then but tripped over his shoelaces and hit his head getting back on board after everything had settled down. He just randomly got killed whilst things were still happening. It meant less than Tasha Yar's. You need more than "happened to die whilst taking part" for a death to be heroic. See Book - and that happened off screen (and for the same off-screen reasons). His was portrayed as the cost for helping Mal and crew, one he'd have known about and accepted, nothing random, and it influenced the characters and their decisions and actions afterwards.Fianna wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 6:19 pm You're acting like the entire mission for Wash was simply "get down to the surface", and that once they did, their job was done. That's not the case. The mission was to broadcast the Miranda message across the system - landing on the surface of that moon was simply one step in completing that mission. When Wash died, they were still in the middle of their heroic endeavor.