Agent Vinod wrote:Morgaine wrote:
Nevermind the fact that the entire setup was cringy and fakey as hell.
We clearly see a blockade of dozens of those ships at the beginning, but by the end somehow miraculously all the other ships have buggered off for no good reason conventiently leaving only a single ship, because when facing an enemy with no single point of failure we have to blatantly manufacture one! And not even give a good justification for it!
A blockade should be encircle the entire planet anyways.
Once the droids have all the spaceports locked down then the orbital blockade becomes unnecessary and the other ships can be moved away leaving just the control ship in orbit. That's why they need the Gungans as a distraction so they aren't overwhelmed by reinforcements, and the one battleship is shown to be pretty adept at fighting them off anyway.
1701EarlGrey wrote:Sorry, if you are defending prequels, then you are part of the problem - you are one of the reasons why bad movies are being made!
You see there is one, very telling line in sf debris's analysis - to paraphrase: "Lucas had hoped that no one will notice, that his story make no sense". Sorry, George, people are not stupid! That is so infuriating - Lucas knowingly and willfully, written bad script, because he thought that people are to stupid to notice! That's why George deserve every bit of criticism, that's why no one should defend his work, because if you do, you encourage creators to write bad stories! Why should they care, if you are willing to accept bad writing? And sorry, but I won't accept this excuse; " Lucas, had no choice!" - he had all time in the world, he had all money in the world, he could tell whatever story he wanted to tell, there was no restrictions put on him by big bad studio! He's movies, his responsibility
I'm not going to deny that they're clunky, awkward or unclear a lot of the time, or claim that they are equal to the originals, but Lucas does not "deserve every bit of criticism". The criticisms are frequently hyperbolic or nonsensical ( like Jar Jar being racist) and things like Mr. Plinkett, which nitpick and exaggerate flaws for comedic effect are treated as the height of careful analysis.