No I do not like Feudalism, the fact that I wrote OP should be proof I'm not a Neo-Feudalism, I only reject the Marxist claim that Capitalism is in every way better.Ironically of course, given Orion's admittance to being an anarchist, medieval feudalism is a very good example of what that would look like in reality and probably why he/she likes the idea so much. A group of people who have all of the power solely because they have more weapons, more men and the equivalent of a big castle, lording over literally everyone else. No police, no help, and a taxman who burns down your house if you don't give him half your stuff every month.
Like BridgeConsoleMasher alluded to a few posts back, there is this subset of people who have a ''freedom fantasy''. They look at the Wild West and the medieval times and they think, ''damn, how awesome would that have been? Just a gun/sword at my hip, a horse under my ass, a traditional woman by my side, and a star to gallop by. And no pesky government getting in my way.''
When in reality of course there is a reason why all of that ended and we tried to adopt something else. That's he elephant in the room to everyone who covets the past, isn't it? If it was so great, why didn't we try harder to keep it? Maybe because it wasn't great. Maybe it was crap and what we have now is better even if it isn't perfect.
BTW, going back to the theme of this thread, Robin Hood. Steals from the rich and gives to the poor. A man who A) wouldn't have needed to exist if the there weren't a ridiculous amount of oppressed poor people back then and B) a man who clearly isn't a fascist given his many fights with the Sheriff of Nottingham i.e. the establishment.
Anarchism means opposing all heirarchy, Feudalism lacking a modern conception of the State means little. Feudalism has it's roots in Platonism.
The Robin Hood myth has appropriated by Reactionaries plenty actually. In fact your very reference to the "Sherif of Nonntingham" contradict the notion that Feudalism had not State or Police.