Here We Go Again (Updated with Restoration Progress)

Post by **SFDebris** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 10:07 pm

It's all moot anyway, because I don't make porn.

I make beautiful erotica.

Wargriffin · Post by **Wargriffin** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 10:10 pm

Welp can't argue with that

Dînadan · Post by **Dînadan** » Sun Dec 10, 2017 11:20 pm

Wargriffin wrote:Welp can't argue with that

At least not without watching an example of it first.

And you can be alone in testing that out Wargriffin...

Wargriffin · Post by **Wargriffin** » Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:16 am

Dînadan wrote:
Wargriffin wrote:Welp can't argue with that
At least not without watching an example of it first.

And you can be alone in testing that out Wargriffin...

Alone again... Naturally

hammerofglass · Post by **hammerofglass** » Mon Dec 11, 2017 3:43 pm

Robovski wrote:I, for one, do not welcome a future where Chuck has explicit XXX reviews. I fully expect Chuck to not be my type and probably not his wife or co-host. Plus it may be distracting with him talking about Lucas while ''performing'' and hard to tell if he liked something or not.

"I'm not sure if he's upset or full of glee, but he's definitely excited."

MrMuffins · Post by **MrMuffins** » Mon Dec 11, 2017 4:59 pm

mathewgsmith wrote:
Robovski wrote:I, for one, do not welcome a future where Chuck has explicit XXX reviews. I fully expect Chuck to not be my type and probably not his wife or co-host. Plus it may be distracting with him talking about Lucas while ''performing'' and hard to tell if he liked something or not.
"I'm not sure if he's upset or full of glee, but he's definitely excited."

It would certainly be a challenge to match the climax of the review to the climax of... something else.

ewmailing · Post by **ewmailing** » Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:41 pm

MrMuffins wrote:
mathewgsmith wrote:
Robovski wrote:I, for one, do not welcome a future where Chuck has explicit XXX reviews. I fully expect Chuck to not be my type and probably not his wife or co-host. Plus it may be distracting with him talking about Lucas while ''performing'' and hard to tell if he liked something or not.
"I'm not sure if he's upset or full of glee, but he's definitely excited."
It would certainly be a challenge to match the climax of the review to the climax of... something else.

We'll just get a lot more random Sisko baseball segments injected into the reviews.

elvisnake · Post by **elvisnake** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Is there an ETA for when the TNG reviews will be back up? I almost don't want to keep watching TNG if I can't watch Chuck's reviews as I go.

Post by **SFDebris** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:00 pm

elvisnake wrote:Is there an ETA for when the TNG reviews will be back up? I almost don't want to keep watching TNG if I can't watch Chuck's reviews as I go.

Probably next week.

elvisnake · Post by **elvisnake** » Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:14 am

SFDebris wrote:
elvisnake wrote:Is there an ETA for when the TNG reviews will be back up? I almost don't want to keep watching TNG if I can't watch Chuck's reviews as I go.
Probably next week.

Not bad at all! Thanks

*Sfdebris.net

Here We Go Again (Updated with Restoration Progress)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated with Restoration Progress)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated with Restoration Progress)

Re: Here We Go Again (Updated with Restoration Progress)