I find this a cheap excuse. Everything is alternate universe these days and the message I take from that is: Don't get invested, because it will be changed in a few years and everything you learned and liked will be invalidated. Once upon a time, alternate universes were a concept I liked, but the ubiquitousness of it has just become tiresome, because it rarely gets used as a good story concept, but more like a blanket excuse for lack of effort and someone wanting to make his own thing, but with a label attached that attracts an audience by default, no matter how loose the connection is.CharlesPhipps wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:35 am Its an alternate continuity. Changes happened. Life goes on.
Either way, it's funny that Jeffrey Wright is brought up. I didn't realize that the "The Batman"-Gordon was actually done by a black actor until now. Well, guess that proves how little it actually matters to me. It's something that just passes below my radar unless I get my nose put into it.
Guess it's the same with this iteration of Gordon. It's not really something that bothers me in and of itself, unless it actively works against the concept of the character. It's just perplexing when it's done without a good reason (argueably, getting a great and otherwise fitting actor for a given character is a good reason, e.g. Heimdall/Elba - though I'm still not entirely happy that a norse god was done by a black actor; I'd really want to know, how this would be recieved if it's done the other way around, say Anansi being played by a white actor that fits the role otherwise...).