Wait. He wasn't carrying the sign?MightyDavidson wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:35 pmAnd their scam was so patently transparent that it ought to have been laughed out of court in a couple minutes. The only way it could have been more obvious is if the Klingon lawyer walked in carrying a neon sign with FALSE FLAG OPERATION emblazoned on it. I mean sensor data alone would've made it clear that it wasn't a civilian vessel.Nealithi wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 5:49 amI kinda think Sisko's talking to Worf was less a don't shoot civilians. And more, don't be so predictable that you can be setup so easily. The klingons had deliberately made an attack pattern then sent in the 'innocent' ship knowing Worf would spot the pattern and shoot.Nobody700 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 2:17 am The fact the civilian ship came INTO a battle, cloaked and than decloaked... honestly, who knows what it was doing there. Theirs a fan theory that the Federation only did this to throw Worf under the bus so the Klingons could come back as an ally. I don't agree, but like... Sisko comes off super weird in his rant to Worf at the end, and I LOVE Sisko, he's awesome and one of the best written characters in Trek. But I refuse to believe HE'D ever say that, after shit he did at THAT point. Picard, and even Kirk, I can buy. But Sisko? No way.
I mean okay I get what the episode was trying to do and it did have good moments, but I don't think it set up the conflict of the story terribly well.
In a more serious vein. Jag on Trek seems to have one setting. Punishment. Not guilt nor innocence, we intend someone to be punished and be harsh about it. Kinda a constant like Admiral pips come with insanity kool aid.
The klingons setup a false flag and everyone could see it. But the letter of the LAW said the jag had to put the guilty on trial. And as usual start at guilt. Heck as fast as the trials happen I think the jag corps is bored.
The previous examples. Kirk? First off the Prime Directive was a rule on a piece of paper that could be bypassed for the greater good. Not dogma at the time. Then, what is his better move? A foreign power was playing god. Kirk was not happy about what he had to do. But he armed the other side in an attempt to rebalance the scales after cultural contamination was thrown out the window.
Sisko on the other hand, everyone was against his orders. But it could be argued he also just rebalanced the scales someone else upset. The maquis made a cardassian world uninhabitable to cardassians, but humans would be fine. So Sisko did the reverse. Which also had the benefit of moving the borders a little.
Sisko playing guerrilla on DS9? The Star Fleet modified station while some members of the Bajoran command wanted them to stay? And in the end it showed the whole thing had been engineered to get the Federation out so Cardassia could retake Bajor and the wormhole? They took one look at that and said, "Medal or court martial. Eh they balance out."