For those of us not familiar, what exactly happened?Fuzzy Necromancer wrote:Yeah, the latter days of Sherlock is where we really got to see that in all of its naked horror.
Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
Honestly not sure where to focus. Gonna need to tag in somebody on this.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
This is an in-depth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkoGBOs5ecM
We must dissent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwqN3Ur ... l=matsku84
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
We Limeys will never fully go metric!
Being married to a Russian, this Limey has to be able to work in both metric and imperial units.
Creator: The Warren McArthur Chronicles
When in doubt, make a cheese sandwich...
When in doubt, make a cheese sandwich...
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
I'd like to hear Chuck attempt a Birmingham accent (I can just about speak with one, but it sounds more like Dudley than Birmingham).
Creator: The Warren McArthur Chronicles
When in doubt, make a cheese sandwich...
When in doubt, make a cheese sandwich...
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
The US have an additional Positive Action Lock (PAL) on their nukes, the UK does not - our government trusts our sub commanders (probably because many of them have gone to posh, expensive, private schools and Oxford/Cambridge before joining the Royal Navy).Sir Will wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:15 pmSeriously!? That is messed up.Jonathan101 wrote:Incidentally, in real life British nuclear submarine captains have autonomy in firing nukes themselves if the situation is dire enough- never mind the UN, not even the British government itself necessarily needs to be consulted before a weapon is fired. The logic for this is that the most likely culprit of a nuclear attack is of course Russia (or those bastards in France of course), and it would not take long at all for a missile fired from Russia to hit the UK (not even counting Russian subs or anything nearer), so unlike the United States (where the President has the sole authority...according to the end of the movie Crimson Tide at least <_<) this type of freedom is (if you're not anti-nuke of course) somewhat warranted.
Disclaimer: I attended a private secondary/high school, but not somewhere like Eton or Harrow.
Creator: The Warren McArthur Chronicles
When in doubt, make a cheese sandwich...
When in doubt, make a cheese sandwich...
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
Because going to posh private schools automatically makes them better? Or is it sarcasm? I can't tell.YAGWG wrote: ↑Sun Apr 29, 2018 6:16 pmThe US have an additional Positive Action Lock (PAL) on their nukes, the UK does not - our government trusts our sub commanders (probably because many of them have gone to posh, expensive, private schools and Oxford/Cambridge before joining the Royal Navy).Sir Will wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:15 pmSeriously!? That is messed up.Jonathan101 wrote:Incidentally, in real life British nuclear submarine captains have autonomy in firing nukes themselves if the situation is dire enough- never mind the UN, not even the British government itself necessarily needs to be consulted before a weapon is fired. The logic for this is that the most likely culprit of a nuclear attack is of course Russia (or those bastards in France of course), and it would not take long at all for a missile fired from Russia to hit the UK (not even counting Russian subs or anything nearer), so unlike the United States (where the President has the sole authority...according to the end of the movie Crimson Tide at least <_<) this type of freedom is (if you're not anti-nuke of course) somewhat warranted.
Disclaimer: I attended a private secondary/high school, but not somewhere like Eton or Harrow.
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
It's most certainly sarcasm. Besides Eton and Harrow are Public schools (but not state schools).
-
- Captain
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:38 pm
Re: Dr. WHO: Aliens in London/World War III
I for the most part enjoyed Mofatt's run, he and Matt Smith basically did exactly the Doctor Who I always wanted. The fifth season in particular was super good, the next couple a little less so. There were definitely problems though... his female characters had a very particular type that rubs some people the wrong way (River in particular... and Missy...which then carried over to Watson's wife in Sherlock) , and he often got caught up in having a mystery box for a season and then not having a great payoff for it. The mystery of River and Amy's baby, the Doctor's name leading to nothing, basically everything about Clara, and so on.
Also, between showrunning Who and Sherlock, and writing half the Who episodes, he was just spread too thin and you started to see him repeating some of his ideas which, brilliant in isolation, wear thin quick when seen twice or three times.
These are for the most part weaknesses that, were we only getting one or two episodes from Moffatt a year, we might not have every really picked up on, but over the course of about 50 episodes (plus Sherlock) within 6 years became pretty clear.
Also, it's pretty clear he was burned out and ready to leave after the 50th anniversary, and had told all the stories he had to tell, at the latest the first year of Capaldi's run, but mostly stayed because they had no one else to replace him. Season 10 he was absolutely on fumes and everything was kind of weak.
The worst crime isn't that he wasn't brilliant 100% of the time though... it's that as showrunner, he let some surpreme stinkers like Kill The Moon or Forest of the Night and there's just no excuse for anything that bad getting through. But then we also got The Doctor's Wife, Vincent and the Doctor, The Girl WHo Waited, Flatline, Mummy on the Orient Express, and others under his watch so... mostly positive.
All that said. I mostly enjoyed the Moffatt era, and downright loved some of it... while I find most of RTD's era unwatchable. I basically can't tolerate any of the episodes with Rose that weren't the Moffatt eps.
Also, between showrunning Who and Sherlock, and writing half the Who episodes, he was just spread too thin and you started to see him repeating some of his ideas which, brilliant in isolation, wear thin quick when seen twice or three times.
These are for the most part weaknesses that, were we only getting one or two episodes from Moffatt a year, we might not have every really picked up on, but over the course of about 50 episodes (plus Sherlock) within 6 years became pretty clear.
Also, it's pretty clear he was burned out and ready to leave after the 50th anniversary, and had told all the stories he had to tell, at the latest the first year of Capaldi's run, but mostly stayed because they had no one else to replace him. Season 10 he was absolutely on fumes and everything was kind of weak.
The worst crime isn't that he wasn't brilliant 100% of the time though... it's that as showrunner, he let some surpreme stinkers like Kill The Moon or Forest of the Night and there's just no excuse for anything that bad getting through. But then we also got The Doctor's Wife, Vincent and the Doctor, The Girl WHo Waited, Flatline, Mummy on the Orient Express, and others under his watch so... mostly positive.
All that said. I mostly enjoyed the Moffatt era, and downright loved some of it... while I find most of RTD's era unwatchable. I basically can't tolerate any of the episodes with Rose that weren't the Moffatt eps.