The Thrawn Trilogy

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by Karha of Honor »

SuccubusYuri wrote: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:04 pm I have always said that no matter how you feel about the Disney acquisition, they did have the balls to canonize Thrawn. It was an olive branch they didn't need to offer, but they did it anyway.

The way things are going they better start offering more olive branches.
Image
User avatar
PapaPalpatine
Officer
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:56 pm

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by PapaPalpatine »

Winter wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 3:29 am
SuccubusYuri wrote: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:04 pm I have always said that no matter how you feel about the Disney acquisition, they did have the balls to canonize Thrawn. It was an olive branch they didn't need to offer, but they did it anyway.
True but I do wish they would canonize Mara Jade like they did Thrawn.
With the hacks who are currently in charge of the Star Wars franchise, it would be just as well that they don't at this point; I personally don't relish the thought of what they'd do if they got their filthy mitts on her.

Also, I have no idea who that was Rey Sue encountered on Porg Island, but it sure as Hell was NOT Luke Skywalker.
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by Admiral X »

Obviously it was a clone that had gone insane. ;)
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
User avatar
PapaPalpatine
Officer
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:56 pm

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by PapaPalpatine »

Admiral X wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:28 pm Obviously it was a clone that had gone insane. ;)
That would not surprise me if it turned out to true.
J!!
Captain
Posts: 869
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:52 pm

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by J!! »

or maybe people change with the passage of 30 years.
User avatar
SuccubusYuri
Officer
Posts: 345
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by SuccubusYuri »

If youtube has taught me anything it's that vocal Star Wars fanboys not only missed all the lessons of the films they profess to love, and that they just want remastered versions of the old films over and over again where nothing changes like the creepy serial killer bedroom in a Hitchcock film. xD
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2307
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by Winter »

Because get out of hand in regards to the Newer films I will say that I don't hate them, they have their issues and there are parts of them I don't like there are some good things in them. The acting is good overall, they're well shot and the music is of course brilliant. I think my biggest issues with the Anthology films is that they are even being made. Not that I think they're bad, I liked Rogue One and I have no real comment on Solo as I haven't seen it, I just know of one scene in detail because a friend saw it and told me about it and I think that's the dumbest moment in Star Wars.

But other then that I've heard that the film was okay but in regards to these Anthology films do they really need to be made? In his Micro-Review of Solo Chuck said that he felt that the Anthology films would be better served as TV Mini-series or a TV series with all these stories that have little impact to on the grander story and I for one agree.

Star Wars The Clone Wars was a huge hit and is seen by many as a redemption of the Prequels with stories that are considered to be just as epic and grand as the films. And they added so much to Star Wars lore, giving the Force a greater sense of wonder and magic, tech was employed smartly and creatively, and introduced several characters that are just as popular as the Original Trilogy characters.

And given that Lucas himself wanted to make a live action Star Wars series but was unable to because of the limitations of the time Star Wars being made into a live action series be it a series of mini-series or a full fledged show with regulars leads while having the films be the special events that we only see once and a while is probably the best move.

And if they go the TV mini-series Disney might even go the alternate continuity route so we could see stories from Legends Universe come to life. Sure I would prefer stories like The Thrawn Trilogy get made into a major motion picture Trilogy and see it on the big screen but I would be completely on board for a TV mini-series of the Trilogy. Game of Thrones has proven that you can have a TV show rival a film in terms of quality and production. And even if they don't do that I think just sticking to their current continuity can work so long as it leads to good stories that feels like Star Wars.
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by Karha of Honor »

SuccubusYuri wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:54 pm If youtube has taught me anything it's that vocal Star Wars fanboys not only missed all the lessons of the films they profess to love, and that they just want remastered versions of the old films over and over again where nothing changes like the creepy serial killer bedroom in a Hitchcock film. xD
If that was the case KOTOR would never had been made or Republic Commando.
Image
MyUserName
Officer
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 6:57 am

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by MyUserName »

PapaPalpatine wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:41 pm
Winter wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 3:29 am
SuccubusYuri wrote: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:04 pm I have always said that no matter how you feel about the Disney acquisition, they did have the balls to canonize Thrawn. It was an olive branch they didn't need to offer, but they did it anyway.
True but I do wish they would canonize Mara Jade like they did Thrawn.
With the hacks who are currently in charge of the Star Wars franchise, it would be just as well that they don't at this point; I personally don't relish the thought of what they'd do if they got their filthy mitts on her.

Also, I have no idea who that was Rey Sue encountered on Porg Island, but it sure as Hell was NOT Luke Skywalker.
Thrawn was so horribly watered down and neutered in Rebels that I can't even refer to that Caricature as Thrawn. EU Thrawn, with the full might of the empire in it's prime at his fingerprints, would have worked up a strategy to wipe out the Rebellion at an art show and had it executed within a month.

I honestly don't want any more EU characters showing up in film or series until Disney is willing to let the characters be as awesome as they deserve to be without watering them down for the children.
MyUserName
Officer
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 6:57 am

Re: The Thrawn Trilogy

Post by MyUserName »

Slash Gallagher wrote: Sat Jun 09, 2018 8:51 am
SuccubusYuri wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:54 pm If youtube has taught me anything it's that vocal Star Wars fanboys not only missed all the lessons of the films they profess to love, and that they just want remastered versions of the old films over and over again where nothing changes like the creepy serial killer bedroom in a Hitchcock film. xD
If that was the case KOTOR would never had been made or Republic Commando.
Or the majority of the EU.

Like any fan, we want the spirit of the franchise to endure and be respected. Most are mad at TLJ because it was a crap film, an awful second entry in the franchise, and it treated the remaining OT characters terribly. Look up Lukes clothes, posture, and make up from the End of TFA and then compare it to the first scene of TLJ. The cape is no longer white, and the main clothes are more grey than white. His makeup is a darker shade and his posture is more stooped. The discarding of all lighter and optimistic characteristics of the character was intentional, from the makeup to the clothes to the directing of his posture and mannerisms. Forget the OT, thats not even respecting the hopeful tone that TFA ended on. Rian Johnson calls it "Subversive." No Rian, the Adams family is Subversive. They care for eachother with all the love a typical family while using divergent social norms to advocate acceptance of differing outlooks on life while undermining the idea of conformity. Your film is flat out disrespectful and undermines all the positives a good Star Wars story should stand for.

And I'm all for strong female characters, I definitely feel the Last Jedi needed one or two of those. Holdo is what a mentally unbalanced militant feminist thinks a strong military leader should be. She reprimands Poe for being a maverick without sharing any battle strategy with him like a leader should. And in doing so causes more damage than good throughout the entire movie, and we are supposed to respect her because she sacrifices herself.

Rey... It was unfair to call her a Mary Sue, someone who is gifted with positive traits without earning them simply because the writer wills it, in TFA because her backstory was unexplored and it was definitely hinted that she had a type of amnesia.

But nope. She's the force's chosen one. That's why she has all those force powers without any training. Way to freaking remove any and all agency and self definition from a character that was already on shaky ground Johnson.

As for Leia... what exactly did she do in the film other than a Mary Poppins impression and check out Poes ass?

And in the Clone Wars, we saw Star Wars borrow plots from Sam Spayed, Godzilla, King Kong, Kagemusha, Seven Samurai, Apocalypse Now, A bridge too far, Night of the Living Dead, and others. And Those were some of the more respected episodes. Star Wars fans are open to a lot, just keep many of the themes in play and we're all good.
Post Reply