"He?" Are we still talking about Hillary, or have we moved on to something else?Slash Gallagher wrote: ↑Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:17 amHe also promised to reveal how much everyone's salary for feminism or some nonsesne like that.
I'm not downplaying it now. It was obviously a huge blunder, and no, of course it wasn't a hidden camera moment. Just a offhand comment in an interview, one of hundreds of interviews that she gave. But it hardly encapsulated her entire campaign.If a Republican would have made that deplorable error you would not be downplaying it. Also it was not a hidden camera footage.
I notice you haven't answered my question about your nationality. Do you actually live in America? Because anyone who lived through Obama knows that he followed on social issues, he didn't lead. He only got on board with gay marriage when it became clear the country as a whole was cool with it. He never really got on board with trans issues to any real degree. Exactly what 'social issue' do you think Obama led left on? Obama's claim to fame was health care, which very few people label a 'social issue.'Obama was extremly left on social issues.
Yes, they were. But they weren't really indicative of his campaign either. Romney's campaign was built around rejecting Obama's agenda, most notably, his health care plan. Democrats managed to frame the debate about his attitude towards certain Americans in light of some unfortunate comments that he made, just as Republicans managed to reframe the debate around Hillary's comments, but Romney's campaign was never about abandoning the poor.Romney's tax comments were a huge deal.
That says more about your limited understand of American politics than anything else.I think that comment is the perfect symbol for her campaing.
But to try and bring this back to Earth, what does ANY of this have to do with Dworkin or Solanas? You know, the two people you accused Hillary of channeling?