Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
Post Reply
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by Karha of Honor »

Which one was the biggest artist led dud?

At which one do you point at that when someone tells you producers should never overrule movie directors?
Image
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by CharlesPhipps »

I liked both.

*is pelted with oranges*
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by Karha of Honor »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:25 am I liked both.

*is pelted with oranges*
Because of their flaws?

Despite their flaws?
Image
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by CharlesPhipps »

They're flawed but fun.

Valerian is clearly a labor of love for Besson and his attempt to create a bizarre amazing world to travel through is one that I had no end of fun with.

The Prequels are....too much...but George also wanted to build multiple new worlds beyond anything one could imagine.

And yes, the acting is wooden blocks talking to wooden blocks.

But that's what happens with pure crazy behind you.
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by Karha of Honor »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:56 am .

But that's what happens with pure crazy behind you.

Plenty of directors who specialize in crazy would disagree.
Image
User avatar
PerrySimm
Captain
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:37 am

Re: Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by PerrySimm »

Valerian is disjointed and offbeat, but you can feel the passion and energy behind it. If Besson had shot the film in French it'd probably be an arthouse darling by now -- still wouldn't have made any money, though.

Star Wars may be in the same genre, but you're not comparing works of the same calibre. Yes, Lucas had full creative control for the prequels. But they are not the works of an auteur.
UGxlYXNlIHByb3ZpZGUgeW91ciBjaGFsbGVuZ2UgcmVzcG9uc2UgZm9yIFJFRCA5NC4K
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5676
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by clearspira »

The Prequels made a ridiculous amount of money; Valerian was a box office failure. The Prequels are controversial but still have plenty of fans and defenders; Valerian can at best hope to become a cult classic. The Prequels had Ewan Mcgregor, Samuel L Jackson, Natalie Portman, and Liam Neeson. Valerian had Dane Dehann, Cara Delevigne and Rihanna - who are just not in the same league. They may be one day, but not yet.

I think this really comes down to what you found most enjoyable, because on paper it is night and day imo. And I didn't even particularly like the Prequels.
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Besson's Valerian vs the Star Wars Prequels?

Post by Karha of Honor »

clearspira wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 7:18 pm The Prequels made a ridiculous amount of money; Valerian was a box office failure. The Prequels are controversial but still have plenty of fans and defenders; Valerian can at best hope to become a cult classic. The Prequels had Ewan Mcgregor, Samuel L Jackson, Natalie Portman, and Liam Neeson. Valerian had Dane Dehann, Cara Delevigne and Rihanna - who are just not in the same league. They may be one day, but not yet.

I think this really comes down to what you found most enjoyable, because on paper it is night and day imo. And I didn't even particularly like the Prequels.
Prequels had the benefit of being part of the most popular franchise on Earth.
Image
Post Reply