Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/12/us/m ... tw-nytimes
I'll kidnap 1,000 children before I let this company die!
-villain from Monsters Inc
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
User avatar
Robovski
Captain
Posts: 1217
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:32 pm
Location: Checked out of here

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Robovski »

They could not come here. Or apply legally for entry.

I know you've been told many times that children are separated as we don't just take an accompanist adult's word for it that they are the parents and not trafficking children or kidnapping from their legal guardian. How do you propose to make a determination?
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

Robovski wrote: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:57 am They could not come here. Or apply legally for entry.

I know you've been told many times that children are separated as we don't just take an accompanist adult's word for it that they are the parents and not trafficking children or kidnapping from their legal guardian. How do you propose to make a determination?
Are you saying the children could just not come here?

Are you aware that most of them are aslyum seekers, who have not actually committed a crime?

I see you bending over backwards to justify baby jail.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 4045
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Madner Kami »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:46 amAre you aware that most of them are aslyum seekers, who have not actually committed a crime?
They crossed one or multiple borders without permission. They actually have comitted a crime.
Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:46 amI see you bending over backwards to justify baby jail.
I'm curious. How would you solve the issue of not being able to reliably tell that a child belongs to it's parents (outside of going straight for a gene-test, which would actually collide with civil rights) and where would you put the children and probable parents while you investigate the validity of their claims?
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
Worffan101
Captain
Posts: 1047
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2018 5:47 pm

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Worffan101 »

Well, I'm in favor of free movement unless a government takes the time to explain in detail why you, specifically, are persona non grate in their country (subject of course to potential popular referendum on the matter if challenged), or you have a restraining order against you (and I don't consider crossing a border to be that, so...).

What I'd do is keep the families together under covert CPS observation in apartment blocks and give them entry-level jobs in local markets and manufacturing to kick-start the economy. Could really help the malaise in this country.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5653
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by clearspira »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:46 am
Robovski wrote: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:57 am They could not come here. Or apply legally for entry.

I know you've been told many times that children are separated as we don't just take an accompanist adult's word for it that they are the parents and not trafficking children or kidnapping from their legal guardian. How do you propose to make a determination?
Are you saying the children could just not come here?

Are you aware that most of them are aslyum seekers, who have not actually committed a crime?

I see you bending over backwards to justify baby jail.
An illegal immigrant is a criminal therefore they have committed a crime. If that is the best argument you've got then this will be quick.
Antiboyscout
Captain
Posts: 1158
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:13 am

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Antiboyscout »

Worffan101 wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 3:25 am Well, I'm in favor of free movement unless a government takes the time to explain in detail why you, specifically, are persona non grate in their country (subject of course to potential popular referendum on the matter if challenged), or you have a restraining order against you (and I don't consider crossing a border to be that, so...).

What I'd do is keep the families together under covert CPS observation in apartment blocks and give them entry-level jobs in local markets and manufacturing to kick-start the economy. Could really help the malaise in this country.
Please stop displaying your absolute ignorance of how an economy works.
User avatar
Robovski
Captain
Posts: 1217
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:32 pm
Location: Checked out of here

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Robovski »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:46 am
Robovski wrote: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:57 am They could not come here. Or apply legally for entry.

I know you've been told many times that children are separated as we don't just take an accompanist adult's word for it that they are the parents and not trafficking children or kidnapping from their legal guardian. How do you propose to make a determination?
Are you saying the children could just not come here?

Are you aware that most of them are aslyum seekers, who have not actually committed a crime?

I see you bending over backwards to justify baby jail.
1. Yes. The children do not need to come into the country illegally. They could come legally.

2. They have committed a crime by entering the country illegally. They can apply for asylum from their home country. Entering the country illegally is not fair on those who do emigrate legally or apply for asylum and should not be rewarded with a pass.

3. I see you make no effort to address the child trafficking that very much happens with illegal crossings of the border. I see you not caring about what happens to the children, just that you don't like what the current administration does when it carries on with a policy from the previous administration.
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4925
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by CharlesPhipps »

The child trafficking is a big concern given some have actually used the government separation as a chance to acquire them.

The government "losing" children being a big thing.
Worffan101
Captain
Posts: 1047
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2018 5:47 pm

Re: Detention of Migrant Children at Highest Level Ever

Post by Worffan101 »

Robovski wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:48 pm
Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:46 am
Robovski wrote: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:57 am They could not come here. Or apply legally for entry.

I know you've been told many times that children are separated as we don't just take an accompanist adult's word for it that they are the parents and not trafficking children or kidnapping from their legal guardian. How do you propose to make a determination?
Are you saying the children could just not come here?

Are you aware that most of them are aslyum seekers, who have not actually committed a crime?

I see you bending over backwards to justify baby jail.
1. Yes. The children do not need to come into the country illegally. They could come legally.

2. They have committed a crime by entering the country illegally. They can apply for asylum from their home country. Entering the country illegally is not fair on those who do emigrate legally or apply for asylum and should not be rewarded with a pass.

3. I see you make no effort to address the child trafficking that very much happens with illegal crossings of the border. I see you not caring about what happens to the children, just that you don't like what the current administration does when it carries on with a policy from the previous administration.
It isn't the child's fault that they're brought across the border. Therefore, they haven't committed a crime.

And also, technically speaking being an undocumented immigrant isn't even a damn crime.
Post Reply