Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Film)

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
User avatar
Robovski
Captain
Posts: 1217
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:32 pm
Location: Checked out of here

Re: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by Robovski »

Nothing to say about the movie?
J!!
Captain
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:52 pm

Re: Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by J!! »

So, something's been bugging me about the end of this movie: why the hell does Spock get demoted? With Kirk and the others it makes sense, as a compromise between rewarding them for saving the earth, and punishing them for stealing the enterprise. But Spock didn't steal shit, he was only in on the heroic parts. If anything, Spock should be getting a promotion, or at least a medal.

Actually, that'd have been an interesting shakeup for the next film; having Spock be Kirk's boss for a change.




Robovski wrote:Nothing to say about the movie?
wanted to put my personal thoughts in a separate post from the review link/description.
Last edited by J!! on Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Durandal_1707
Captain
Posts: 790
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:24 am

Re: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by Durandal_1707 »

The "conversation" at 19:34 in part 2 is, in my opinion, the funniest thing he ever did.
J!!
Captain
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:52 pm

Re: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by J!! »

Durandal_1707 wrote:The "conversation" at 19:34 in part 2 is, in my opinion, the funniest thing he ever did.
you just got me to rewatch that bit, the "Huh?" cracks me up every time.
User avatar
Durandal_1707
Captain
Posts: 790
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:24 am

Re: Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by Durandal_1707 »

"You're destroying the oceans! You know, where I live?"
User avatar
SuccubusYuri
Officer
Posts: 345
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by SuccubusYuri »

Well, I mean, was Spock demoted? I can't recall of the top of my head. He was a Captain in 2 and a Captain in 6, the resurrection thing is a little blurry in those regards.
J!!
Captain
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:52 pm

Re: Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by J!! »

was he a captain in 6? that would mean that the enterprise had two captains for a number or years. though that might explain how he was able to volunteer the enterprise for a mission without consulting jim first.

ok, starfleet's rank structure makes no sense on the best days, so i guess a captain could serve as first officer under another captain. but that still leaves the question of why he doesn't get to have his own ship anymore.



Then again, by that point Sulu's been promoted to Captain, with his own ship. So it's just as likely that Spock's been re-promoted by that point too.


I think the most reasonable explanation might just be that Spock is considered an accomplice because his soul was riding along in McCoy's brain at the time.
User avatar
nebagram
Officer
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:27 am

Re: Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by nebagram »

It's even funnier when you remember that Scotty held the rank of captain at that time as well. Then again, as Scotty says as Relics, he never wanted to be a command officer, only an engineer- likely Spock was offered command of a ship but felt he was better off as Kirk's second in command.
ScreamingDoom
Officer
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:18 pm

Re: Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Film)

Post by ScreamingDoom »

J!! wrote:So, something's been bugging me about the end of this movie: why the hell does Spock get demoted? ... But Spock didn't steal shit, he was only in on the heroic parts. If anything, Spock should be getting a promotion, or at least a medal.
The one tribunal (Council?) judge does offer Spock a way out: he specifically says that Spock is not accused of the crime, but Spock responds that he "stands with [his] crewmates". So, I guess in Federation (or Starfleet?) law that represents a specific request to be judged according to the same standards, even if one does not stand accused of the same crime.

Kinda a strange law precedent there, though. There's a story in there somewhere about what caused it to be a thing. Why would someone voluntarily -- no, not voluntarily, actually demand -- to be accused of a crime some other officer/citizen is charged? I'm imagining some sort of Federation Law Wizard using it as a Clever Means to prove his client innocent.
Post Reply