This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
LittleRaven wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:51 pm
Sure. I recognize that you are using 'the Klan' as shorthand for 'a whole bunch of nasty characters that are tied up in crime and white supremacy.' And I get why you're using it that way. It's perfectly understandable. But 'the Klan' is still an actual, real organization, and Antiboyscout is right when he labels it a tiny, pathetic one.
I'm stating that said nasty organizations are usually directly founded by a former (or even existing) member of The Klan. David Duke broke up the KKK organization due to the fact his "soft style" was disliked by a large number of the extremists in the extremist organization. Hence, many of them formed branch groups.
Basically, I'm saying that while the KKK itself is very small. KKK branch groups are not at all such and it's not a bad thing to simply say they're all the Klan. Which means it's NOT small and broken, just decentralized.
There are more black nationalist organizations than Klan affiliates, and if you're going to include drug dealing street gangs then BOY do I have some news for you.
Even if that's true....how does that affect things? Do you think it's a competition? Do you think the meth dealing, drug using, gay beating, black church shooting pieces of shit get a pass? If so, why? What morality system does that?
Mind you, given I believe in racial harmony, what do you believe in?
LittleRaven wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:51 pm
Sure. I recognize that you are using 'the Klan' as shorthand for 'a whole bunch of nasty characters that are tied up in crime and white supremacy.' And I get why you're using it that way. It's perfectly understandable. But 'the Klan' is still an actual, real organization, and Antiboyscout is right when he labels it a tiny, pathetic one.
I'm stating that said nasty organizations are usually directly founded by a former (or even existing) member of The Klan. David Duke broke up the KKK organization due to the fact his "soft style" was disliked by a large number of the extremists in the extremist organization. Hence, many of them formed branch groups.
Basically, I'm saying that while the KKK itself is very small. KKK branch groups are not at all such and it's not a bad thing to simply say they're all the Klan. Which means it's NOT small and broken, just decentralized.
There are more black nationalist organizations than Klan affiliates, and if you're going to include drug dealing street gangs then BOY do I have some news for you.
Even if that's true....how does that affect things? Do you think it's a competition? Do you think the meth dealing, drug using, gay beating, black church shooting pieces of shit get a pass? If so, why? What morality system does that?
Mind you, given I believe in racial harmony, what do you believe in?
CharlesPhipps wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:30 am
I don't think we're in any danger of anti-white groups being given a free pass. Historically, they've been attacked consistently and relentlessly.
Mind you, living in Kentucky where the Klan lives and breathes, I think it's fine to say the reverse needs more worrying about.
